13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CP13</strong>/6<br />

<strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Firms</strong><br />

27. As discussed, we estimate that circa 1,000 13 of BIPRU firms will not be subject to <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong><br />

due to the proposed exercise by the FCA of the discretion in article 95(2) of the Regulation.<br />

These firms will continue to be subject to existing <strong>CRD</strong> III capital provisions and will continue<br />

submitting their in<strong>for</strong>mation in the existing <strong>for</strong>ms. On the other hand, at least 1,400 firms will<br />

need to comply with the new <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> reporting framework. Table 15 shows the approximate<br />

distribution of these firms by size 14 and type. 15<br />

Table 15: Approximate number of firms mandated to comply with the reporting<br />

framework 16<br />

Approximate number of firms<br />

<strong>Investment</strong><br />

Firm Type Small Mid-Size Large<br />

Totals by<br />

type<br />

Full-Scope 160 30 10 200<br />

Limited<br />

Activity<br />

Limited<br />

License<br />

15 20 5 40<br />

1100 50 10 1160<br />

Total by size 1275 100 25 1400<br />

28. The incremental compliance costs per firm include one-off and on-going costs. Given the<br />

uncertainty of the cost impact on the investment firms affected, the costs are estimated based<br />

on the replies of firms responding to a survey conducted by the FSA. 17 Table 16 and Table<br />

17 show the estimated incremental one-off and annual on-going compliance costs per firm<br />

respectively. The estimates are based on the median costs by firm type and size category.<br />

Table 16: Estimated incremental one-off compliance costs per firm<br />

Costs per firm (£ thousands)<br />

<strong>Investment</strong> Firm<br />

Type<br />

Small Mid-Size Large<br />

Full-Scope 20 155 350<br />

Limited Activity 10 21 59<br />

Limited License 11 NA 18 30<br />

13 See footnote 11.<br />

14 <strong>Firms</strong> were categorised into small, mid-size and large firms. Small investment firms are those with assets less than £100 million,<br />

mid-size are those with assets between £100 million and £1billion and large are those with assets above £1 billion. For asset<br />

management firms, assets under management are used instead of total assets but the same thresholds were used.<br />

15 These are approximate figures as we do not record firm’s MIFID activities.<br />

16 The approximate number of firms that will need to comply with the reporting framework is the difference between the total number<br />

of BIPRU firms (see Table 14) and the number of firms that will not be subject to <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> due to the discretion in article 95(2). The<br />

approximate figures presented in this table have been rounded up.<br />

17 Approximately 13% of relevant BIPRU investment firms completed a survey conducted by the FSA.<br />

18 Given the small number of firms in this category and the low response rate to this survey, we are unable to estimates the costs <strong>for</strong><br />

this size and type of firms due to the lack of representativeness of the data.<br />

66 July 2013<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Conduct</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!