13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CP13</strong>/6<br />

<strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Firms</strong><br />

4.10 Article 11(3) of the CRR allows competent authorities to exempt investment firms from Part<br />

Six liquidity requirements on a consolidated basis, ‘taking into account the nature, scale and<br />

complexity of the investment firm’s activities.’ Accordingly, we intend to apply COREP liquidity<br />

reporting (and from 2015 binding liquidity requirements) on a consolidated basis to groups<br />

that contain a full scope IFPRU investment firm which meets the definition of significant firms<br />

outlined in Chapter 5 and also exceeds the threshold to be an ILAS firm.<br />

Q10: In your view, is this approach proportional and risk<br />

based? If not, which category or categories of firms<br />

(within the solely FCA regulated <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> population) do<br />

you perceive as appropriate to submit <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> liquidity<br />

reporting <strong>for</strong>ms from 2014 and be subject to binding<br />

liquidity requirements from 2015?<br />

4.11 Article 508(2) of the CRR requires the Commission to report on whether and how the liquidity<br />

coverage requirement within the CRR should apply to investment firms by 31 December 2015.<br />

4.12 Data from firms’ COREP liquidity submissions will primarily be used to better understand<br />

the liquidity risk profile of the affected firms, and to in<strong>for</strong>m the Commission’s review of the<br />

liquidity regime <strong>for</strong> investment firms. It would not be used to monitor an en<strong>for</strong>ceable liquidity<br />

requirement until CRR binding liquidity requirements are introduced in 2015 <strong>for</strong>, as proposed<br />

above, significant full scope IFPRU investment firms that have balance sheets in excess of £50m<br />

net assets.<br />

4.13 In addition, to in<strong>for</strong>m the EU review of the liquidity regime <strong>for</strong> investment firms, we will<br />

approach some firms caught by our definition of a significant institution that do not meet the<br />

full ILAS criteria to submit these COREP liquidity returns on a voluntary basis. In asking <strong>for</strong> this<br />

we hope to accumulate liquidity data <strong>for</strong> a wider range of business models, which can be used<br />

to build an appropriate and proportionate European regime <strong>for</strong> investment firms. We believe<br />

that this is in the interest of the industry.<br />

4.14 A summary of how the <strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> liquidity proposals apply to different types of IFPRU investment<br />

firms is outlined in table 8 below:<br />

Table 8<br />

Does IFPRU Chapter<br />

7 apply?<br />

Do existing FSA0xx<br />

liquidity templates<br />

apply?<br />

Does COREP<br />

liquidity reporting<br />

apply from 2014?<br />

Do binding<br />

minimum<br />

requirements apply<br />

from 2015?<br />

A Full scope IFPRU<br />

investment firm<br />

that is identified as<br />

significant and is an<br />

ILAS firm<br />

A Full scope<br />

IFPRU investment<br />

firm that is not<br />

covered in the<br />

first column<br />

An IFPRU<br />

limited<br />

activity firm<br />

Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Yes Yes Yes Yes<br />

Yes No No No<br />

Yes No No No<br />

An IFPRU<br />

limited<br />

licence firm<br />

32 July 2013<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Conduct</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!