13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CP13</strong>/6<br />

<strong>CRD</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Investment</strong> <strong>Firms</strong><br />

Q24: Do you agree with our proposal to define a firm as<br />

a ‘significant’ firm if it exceeds at least one of these<br />

thresholds? If not, please explain why not and propose<br />

alternative approaches and the rationale <strong>for</strong> those<br />

approaches.<br />

Q25: Do you agree to our proposal to exercise the discretion<br />

in article 95(2) of the CRR to retain current <strong>CRD</strong> rules<br />

in <strong>for</strong>ce on own funds requirements (Pillar 1) <strong>for</strong> BIPRU<br />

firms keeping the ‘status quo’ pending the EU-wide<br />

review of what is an appropriate prudential regime as<br />

a whole <strong>for</strong> firms in the investment sector in 2015? If<br />

not, please explain why not and propose alternative<br />

approaches and the rationale <strong>for</strong> those approaches.<br />

Q26: Do you agree to our proposal to retain current <strong>CRD</strong><br />

rules in <strong>for</strong>ce on Pillar 2, Pillar 3 and systems and control<br />

requirements in SYSC (including the Remuneration Code)<br />

<strong>for</strong> BIPRU firms keeping the ‘status quo’ pending the EUwide<br />

review of what is an appropriate prudential regime<br />

as a whole <strong>for</strong> firms in the investment sector in 2015?<br />

If not, please explain why not and propose alternative<br />

approaches and the rationale <strong>for</strong> those approaches.<br />

Q27: Do you agree to our proposal to grant CRR-based<br />

permissions with effect from 1 January 2014 to those<br />

firms currently holding an eligible waiver related to<br />

a GENPRU / BIPRU rule – listed in tables 12 and 13 –<br />

provided the conditions in paragraph 7.6 are met? If<br />

not please explain why not and propose alternative<br />

approaches and the rationale <strong>for</strong> those approaches.<br />

Q28: Do you have any comments on our cost benefit analysis?<br />

Q29: Do you agree with our proposed approach to the<br />

national discretions? If not, please indicate the areas of<br />

national discretion where you disagree with the FCA<br />

proposal stating your reasons and alternative proposal.<br />

Q30: Do you believe that there are any articles in the Directive<br />

or in the Regulation –not covered in Annex 3 – which<br />

would require the FCA to exercise its discretion as a CA?<br />

If so, what articles would you suggest and why?<br />

94 July 2013<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Conduct</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!