13.04.2014 Views

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

CP13/6 - CRD IV for Investment Firms - Financial Conduct Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FCA 2013/xx<br />

4.7.1 G For purposes of purchase transactions and securities lending or borrowing<br />

transactions, the FCA does not consider that there are any core market<br />

participants apart from those entities listed in article 227(3) of the EU CRR.<br />

4 Annex 1G Slotting criteria<br />

Table 1 - Supervisory rating grades <strong>for</strong> project finance exposures<br />

<strong>Financial</strong><br />

strength<br />

Market<br />

conditions<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> ratios<br />

(eg, debt service<br />

coverage ratio<br />

(DSCR), loan<br />

life coverage<br />

ratio (LLCR),<br />

project life<br />

coverage ratio<br />

(PLCR), and<br />

debt-to-equity<br />

ratio)<br />

Stress analysis<br />

<strong>Financial</strong><br />

structure<br />

Strong Good Satisfactory Weak<br />

Few competing<br />

suppliers or<br />

substantial and<br />

durable advantage<br />

in location, cost,<br />

or technology.<br />

Demand is strong<br />

and growing<br />

Strong financial<br />

ratios considering<br />

the level of<br />

project risk; very<br />

robust economic<br />

assumptions<br />

The project can<br />

meet its financial<br />

obligations under<br />

sustained,<br />

severely stressed<br />

economic or<br />

sectoral<br />

conditions<br />

Few competing<br />

suppliers or better<br />

than average<br />

location, cost, or<br />

technology but<br />

this situation may<br />

not last. Demand<br />

is strong and<br />

stable<br />

Strong to<br />

acceptable<br />

financial ratios<br />

considering the<br />

level of project<br />

risk; robust<br />

project economic<br />

assumptions<br />

The project can<br />

meet its financial<br />

obligations under<br />

normal stressed<br />

economic or<br />

sectoral<br />

conditions. The<br />

project is only<br />

likely to default<br />

under severe<br />

economic<br />

conditions<br />

Project has no<br />

advantage in<br />

location, cost, or<br />

technology.<br />

Demand is<br />

adequate and<br />

stable<br />

Standard<br />

financial ratios<br />

considering the<br />

level of project<br />

risk<br />

The project is<br />

vulnerable to<br />

stresses that are<br />

not uncommon<br />

through an<br />

economic cycle,<br />

and may default<br />

in a normal<br />

downturn<br />

Project has<br />

worse than<br />

average<br />

location, cost,<br />

or technology.<br />

Demand is<br />

weak and<br />

declining<br />

Aggressive<br />

financial ratios<br />

considering the<br />

level of project<br />

risk<br />

The project is<br />

likely to default<br />

unless<br />

conditions<br />

improve soon<br />

Page 103 of 197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!