2013 Water System Plan, Volume II - Seattle City Clerk's Office - City ...
2013 Water System Plan, Volume II - Seattle City Clerk's Office - City ...
2013 Water System Plan, Volume II - Seattle City Clerk's Office - City ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 18 <strong>Plan</strong> Review<br />
subject to confirmation by the <strong>Seattle</strong> Fire Department. Under most circumstances, the SPU<br />
WAC Administrator completes these Certificates within five business days. DPD requires an<br />
approved WAC before it will issue a building permit for new development.<br />
Not all projects require a WAC. DPD or SPU will determine whether a WAC is required based on<br />
a seven-item WAA checklist. If a developer meets all criteria listed on the checklist, DPD issues a<br />
<strong>Water</strong> Availability Approval without requiring a WAC from SPU. If project conditions change,<br />
DPD’s <strong>Water</strong> Availability Approval can be invalidated. If so, SPU requires a WAC.<br />
A. WAC Process<br />
Normally the WAC is obtained during Preliminary Assessment, which automatically requests it.<br />
However, a developer can request assurance at any time that there is sufficient water available<br />
for a proposed new development. Or, at any time, a developer can complete a WAC request<br />
form and submit it to DPD. The SPU plan reviewer should follow the WAC process .<br />
Tip: DPD routes WAC requests with a site or utility plan to SPU for plan review. While the<br />
WAC typically indicates if a project needs to upgrade or build a new water main, SPU water<br />
policy can be unclear as to the best application of this requirement. If so, consult with the SPU<br />
<strong>Plan</strong> Review Supervisor.<br />
B. WAC Appeal<br />
The developer can appeal WAC conditions by submitting a WAC Customer Appeal to the plan<br />
review supervisor. The appeals go through the following process:<br />
1. <strong>Plan</strong> review supervisor conducts a bi-weekly meeting that includes the following:<br />
a. Engineering plan reviewer who developed the WAC<br />
b. <strong>Water</strong> lead<br />
c. Engineering <strong>Plan</strong> Review Manager<br />
d. USM <strong>Water</strong> Business Area Manager<br />
e. Customer Service (not at all meetings)<br />
2. Meeting attendees decide whether to approve or deny the appeal, or possibly negotiate<br />
alternatives with the developer. On occasion, site visits or follow-up research may be<br />
required.<br />
3. Engineering plan reviewer prepares and sends the developer a letter stating the<br />
decision.<br />
The entire process should be completed within two weeks. Applicants who receive a denial<br />
letter may re-appeal if new information is presented that was not previously considered. When<br />
all appeals have been heard, if the applicant still believes the decision was in error, they can<br />
elevate the issue to the Project Management and Engineering Director in the Project Delivery<br />
Branch at SPU.<br />
C. <strong>Water</strong> Availability Inquiry (WAI)<br />
The <strong>Water</strong> Availability Inquiry (WAI) follows the same steps as the WAC process, but is based on<br />
a preliminary understanding of proposed land use. Under most circumstances, it is completed in<br />
SPU Design Standards and Guidelines 18-11