14.04.2014 Views

2013 Water System Plan, Volume II - Seattle City Clerk's Office - City ...

2013 Water System Plan, Volume II - Seattle City Clerk's Office - City ...

2013 Water System Plan, Volume II - Seattle City Clerk's Office - City ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 18 <strong>Plan</strong> Review<br />

subject to confirmation by the <strong>Seattle</strong> Fire Department. Under most circumstances, the SPU<br />

WAC Administrator completes these Certificates within five business days. DPD requires an<br />

approved WAC before it will issue a building permit for new development.<br />

Not all projects require a WAC. DPD or SPU will determine whether a WAC is required based on<br />

a seven-item WAA checklist. If a developer meets all criteria listed on the checklist, DPD issues a<br />

<strong>Water</strong> Availability Approval without requiring a WAC from SPU. If project conditions change,<br />

DPD’s <strong>Water</strong> Availability Approval can be invalidated. If so, SPU requires a WAC.<br />

A. WAC Process<br />

Normally the WAC is obtained during Preliminary Assessment, which automatically requests it.<br />

However, a developer can request assurance at any time that there is sufficient water available<br />

for a proposed new development. Or, at any time, a developer can complete a WAC request<br />

form and submit it to DPD. The SPU plan reviewer should follow the WAC process .<br />

Tip: DPD routes WAC requests with a site or utility plan to SPU for plan review. While the<br />

WAC typically indicates if a project needs to upgrade or build a new water main, SPU water<br />

policy can be unclear as to the best application of this requirement. If so, consult with the SPU<br />

<strong>Plan</strong> Review Supervisor.<br />

B. WAC Appeal<br />

The developer can appeal WAC conditions by submitting a WAC Customer Appeal to the plan<br />

review supervisor. The appeals go through the following process:<br />

1. <strong>Plan</strong> review supervisor conducts a bi-weekly meeting that includes the following:<br />

a. Engineering plan reviewer who developed the WAC<br />

b. <strong>Water</strong> lead<br />

c. Engineering <strong>Plan</strong> Review Manager<br />

d. USM <strong>Water</strong> Business Area Manager<br />

e. Customer Service (not at all meetings)<br />

2. Meeting attendees decide whether to approve or deny the appeal, or possibly negotiate<br />

alternatives with the developer. On occasion, site visits or follow-up research may be<br />

required.<br />

3. Engineering plan reviewer prepares and sends the developer a letter stating the<br />

decision.<br />

The entire process should be completed within two weeks. Applicants who receive a denial<br />

letter may re-appeal if new information is presented that was not previously considered. When<br />

all appeals have been heard, if the applicant still believes the decision was in error, they can<br />

elevate the issue to the Project Management and Engineering Director in the Project Delivery<br />

Branch at SPU.<br />

C. <strong>Water</strong> Availability Inquiry (WAI)<br />

The <strong>Water</strong> Availability Inquiry (WAI) follows the same steps as the WAC process, but is based on<br />

a preliminary understanding of proposed land use. Under most circumstances, it is completed in<br />

SPU Design Standards and Guidelines 18-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!