02.05.2014 Views

Projected Costs of Generating Electricity - OECD Nuclear Energy ...

Projected Costs of Generating Electricity - OECD Nuclear Energy ...

Projected Costs of Generating Electricity - OECD Nuclear Energy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

France<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> the DGEMP study <strong>of</strong> reference costs for power generation<br />

The first part <strong>of</strong> the 2003 study <strong>of</strong> reference costs for power generation has been completed. It was carried<br />

out by the General Directorate for <strong>Energy</strong> and Raw Materials (DGEMP) <strong>of</strong> the French Ministry <strong>of</strong><br />

the Economy, Finance and Industry, with the collaboration <strong>of</strong> power-plant operators, construction firms<br />

and many other experts. A Review Committee <strong>of</strong> experts including economists (Forecasting Department,<br />

French Planning Office), qualified public figures, representatives <strong>of</strong> power-plant construction firms and<br />

operators, and non-governmental organization (NGO) experts, was consulted in the final phase. The study<br />

examines the costs <strong>of</strong> power generated by different methods – i.e. nuclear and fossil-fuel (gas-, coal-, and<br />

oil-fired) power plants – in the context <strong>of</strong> an industrial operation beginning in the year 2015.<br />

The second part <strong>of</strong> the study is devoted to decentralised production methods (wind, photovoltaic, combined<br />

heat and power).<br />

Study approach<br />

The study is undertaken mainly from an investor’s perspective and uses an 8% discount rate to evaluate<br />

the expenses and receipts from different years.<br />

In addition, the investment costs are considered explicitly in terms <strong>of</strong> interest during construction.<br />

Plant operating on a full-time basis (year-round)<br />

Figure 1 illustrates the main conclusions <strong>of</strong> the study for an effective operating period <strong>of</strong> 8 000 hours.<br />

Figure 1 – Production costs (incl. tax), discounted at 8% and<br />

including CO 2 costs, for a full-time operation in 2015 (company perspective)<br />

€/MWh<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

Additional CO 2 costs at 20 €/t<br />

CO 2 costs at 64 €/t<br />

Basic costs (excluding CO 2 )<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

<strong>Nuclear</strong> Combined-cycle<br />

gas turbine<br />

Circulating<br />

fluidised coal bed<br />

Pulverised coal with<br />

flue-gas treatment<br />

It can be seen that nuclear is more competitive than the other production methods for a year-round<br />

operation with an 8% discount rate applied to expenses. This competitiveness is even better if the costs<br />

related to greenhouse-gas (CO 2 ) emission are taken into account in estimating the MWh cost price.<br />

Integrating the costs resulting from CO 2 emissions by non-nuclear fuels (gas, coal), which will be<br />

compulsory as <strong>of</strong> 2004 with the transposition <strong>of</strong> European directives, increases the total cost per MWh <strong>of</strong><br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!