Projected Costs of Generating Electricity - OECD Nuclear Energy ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2.3 – List of responses 1 Country Nuclear Coal (type) Gas Wind Hydro CHP (technology) Distributed Others Oil Solar MWe/MWth generation Canada 2x703 (PHWR) [3] 1x450 1x580 United States 1x1 000 (GENIII) 1x600 1x400 50x1 40/45 (gas) 1x10 (FC1/G) 1x30 (LG) 1x550 (IGCC) 1x230 1x100 3/3.5 (gas) 1x2 (FC2/G) 1x100 (CR) 1x5 1x1 (FC3/G) 50 (geoth.) Austria 11x1.75 1x14 84/127 (CCGT) 1x1.5 8/20 (biomass) 105/110 (CCGT) Belgium [2] 1x400 5x2 Czech Republic [3] 1x1 000 (PWR) [6] 1x300 [5] 1x250 6x1.5 1x3 300/120 (coal) 1x10 (CR) [6] 1x150 [4] 1x0.025 250/120 (CCGT) 1x10 (WI) [5] 1x300 (IGCC) [6] 1x150 Denmark 1x400 80x2 11/12 (gas) 72x2.22 485/575 (mix) 1x1.5 58/58 (gas) 500x0.001 350/455(straw/coal) Finland [3] 1x1 500 (PWR) 1x500 160/300 (coal) 470/420 (gas) France [2/3] 1x1 590 (PWR) 1x900 1x900 1x600 Germany 1x1 590 (PWR) 1x800 1x1 000 100x3 1x0.714 500/600 (coal) 1x450 (IGCC) 10x1.5 200/280 (coal) 1x425 (IGCC) 10x1.5 200/160 (gas) 1x1050 1x0.002 200/190 (gas) 1x0.5 1/1.5 (biogas) Greece 2x50 1x377.7 17x0.835 2x2 1x476.3 16x0.75 2x60+1x3.5 7x0.6 5x0.6 7x0.6 Italy 1x791 30x2 2x575 36x2 1x384 Netherlands 1x1 600 (PWR) [2] 1x500 60x2 81/65 (CCGT) [2]1x58.4(WI) 250/175 (CCGT) Portugal 3x400 10x2 Slovak Republic [4] 2x447 (PWR) 2x114 1x391 2x1.35 19.5/98 (lignite) 1x114 Switzerland 1x1 600 (BWR) 1x400 2.74/2.90 (gas) 1x250 0.526/0.633 (gas) 1x110 Turkey 1x340 2x350 1x500 2x140 1x160 Japan 1x1 330 (ABWR) 1x800 1 600 1x19 Korea, Rep. of [4] 2x953 (PWR) [8] 2x478 [8] 2x444.6 [4] 2x1 341.2 (PWR) [6] 2x766.4 Bulgaria 2x300 1x80 90/ns Romania [3] 1x665 (PHWR) [62] 1x315 South Africa, 6x641.67 5x387 4x332.5 (PS) Rep. of 2x233 1. Plant capacities are given in MWe: [number of units on the site if different from 1] number of units taken into account in the cost estimates x unit capacity. A list of acronyms and abbreviations used in the following tables, and elsewhere in the report, is given in Appendix 11. 28
Table 2.4 – Coal plant specifications Country Abbrev. Plant type/emission Net Net Cooling Site CO 2 Cost name control equipment capacity thermal tower emission estimation of incl. in costs efficiency source/ the plant (MWe) [LHV] (%) (t/MWh) date Canada CAN-C PF(SC)/FGD, LNB, FF [3] 1x450 38.7 a No Existing 0.85 P/03 United States USA-C1 PF/FGD, SCR, FF 1x600 39.3 No New 0.8121 M/03 USA-C2 IGCC/FGD, SCR, FF 1x550 46.3 No New 0.8121 M/03 Czech Republic CZE-C1 PF, brown coal/FGD, de NO x , dust [6] 1x300 37 Yes Existing 0.99 P/03 CZE-C2 FBC, brown coal/de S [6] 1x150 37 Yes Existing 0.99 P/03 CZE-C3 IGCC/de SO x , de NO x [5] 1x300 43 Yes Existing 0.78 P/03 CZE-C4 FBC, brown coal & biomass/de SO x [6] 1x150 37 Yes Existing 0.78 P/03 Denmark DNK-C STC/FGD, SCR, ESP 1x400 48 No Existing 0.71 P/03 Finland FIN-C (SC)/FGD, SCR, ESP 1x500 46 No New 0.725 P/03 France FRA-C1 PF(SC)/ns 1x900 47.1 ns Existing 0.737 Q/03 FRA-C2 FBC/ns 1x600 46.1 ns Existing 0.748 Q/03 Germany DEU-C1 PF/dust, FGD, SCR 1x800 46 Yes New 0.728 Q/04 DEU-C2 IGCC/dust, desulphurisation 1x450 51 Yes New 0.656 Q/04 DEU-C3 IGCC/dust, desulph., CO 2 capt. 1x425 45 Yes New 0. 089 P/04 DEU-C4 PF, lignite/dust, desulphurisation 1x1 050 45 Yes New 0.796 Q/04 Slovak Republic SVK-C1 FBC/de SO x , de NO x , ESP 2x114 34.7 No Existing 0.865 P/03 SVK-C2 FBC, lignite/de SO x , de NO x , ESP 1x114.4 34.5 Yes Existing 0.973 P/03 Turkey TUR-C1 PF, lignite/FGD, de NO x 1x340 35 Yes Existing 1.262 Q/01 TUR-C2 PF/FGD, de NO x 1x500 38 Yes New 0.917 Q/01 TUR-C3 FBC, Lignite/limestone 1x160 41 Yes New 1.027 Q/01 Japan JPN-C PF/FGD, SCR, ESP 1x800 42.1 No New 0.775 P/04 Korea, Rep. of KOR-C1 PF/FGD, SCR, ESP [8] 2x478 41.29 No New 0.8924 P-O/03 KOR-C2 PF/FGD, SCR, ESP [6] 2x766.4 42.75 No New 0.8419 P-O/03 Bulgaria BGR-C PF, lignite/de SO x , de NO x 2x300 34.8 ns New 1.07 P/03 Romania ROU-C PF/de SO x , de NO x , particles [2] 1x296 29.0 Yes Existing 1.133 P-FS/03 South Africa, ZAF-C1 PF/FGD 6x642 34.59 Yes New ns P/03 Rep. of ZAF-C2 FBC/ns 2x233 36.65 Yes New ns P/03 a. Higher Heating Value (HHV) instead of Lower Heating Value (LHV). Abbreviations: ns = not specified – P = Paper analysis – O = Ordered plant price(s) Q = Quotation – M = Mixed – FS = Feasibility study 29
Page 1: NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY INTERNATIONAL
Page 4: ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
Page 9 and 10: Table of Contents Table of Contents
Page 11: Figures Figure 3.1 Specific overnig
Page 14 and 15: The introduction of liberalisation
Page 16 and 17: 150 USD/MWh at a 5% discount rate a
Page 18 and 19: The technologies and plant types co
Page 20 and 21: locations and/or very favourable co
Page 22 and 23: conclusions of the study were used
Page 25 and 26: Chapter 2 Input Data and Cost Calcu
Page 27 and 28: equipped with emission control devi
Page 29: Table 2.2 - Exchange rates (as of 1
Page 33 and 34: Table 2.7 - Wind and solar power pl
Page 35: Table 2.10 - Other plant specificat
Page 38 and 39: Figure 3.1 - Specific overnight con
Page 40 and 41: exchange rates, the coal prices var
Page 42 and 43: Construction time Gas-fired power p
Page 44 and 45: USD/MWh 70 60 Figure 3.5 - Levelise
Page 46 and 47: O&M costs The specific annual O&M c
Page 48 and 49: Cost ranges for coal, gas and nucle
Page 50 and 51: Ratio 1.9 Figure 3.12 - Cost ratios
Page 52 and 53: Table 3.11 - Overnight construction
Page 54 and 55: Table 3.14 - Projected generation c
Page 56 and 57: Except for the offshore plant in th
Page 58 and 59: At 10% discount rate, the levelised
Page 60 and 61: At 5% discount rate, hydroelectrici
Page 64 and 65: Table 4.6 - Projected generation co
Page 66 and 67: A CHP plant typically supplies heat
Page 70 and 71: Figure 5.2 - Levelised costs of ele
Page 72 and 73: lower unit capital and operating co
Page 76 and 77: cost calculation for some 130 power
Page 78 and 79: It should be stressed that the plan
Page 80 and 81:
Concluding remarks The lowest level
Page 82 and 83:
Portugal Mr. António B. Gomes EDP
Page 84 and 85:
Table A2.1 - Nuclear plant investme
Page 86 and 87:
Overnight Capital Costs: Constructi
Page 88 and 89:
Table A2.7 - Gas-fired (including C
Page 90 and 91:
Table A2.10 - Wind plant investment
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Cost structure of supported green e
Page 98 and 99:
The highest investment cost arises
Page 100 and 101:
The expected development of the per
Page 102 and 103:
● ● Autoproducers. These firms
Page 104 and 105:
Canada The electricity market situa
Page 106 and 107:
Natural gas - combined cycle gas tu
Page 108 and 109:
Denmark Basic data Denmark has abou
Page 110 and 111:
In the future, both an increase in
Page 112 and 113:
nuclear operator Teollisuuden Voima
Page 114 and 115:
these power generation methods. Two
Page 116 and 117:
Figure 5 - Competitiveness of vario
Page 118 and 119:
2004. It envisages the gradual incr
Page 120 and 121:
Table 4 - Gross electricity supply
Page 122 and 123:
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Page 124 and 125:
Electricity generation costs The to
Page 126 and 127:
photovoltaic device. Finally the su
Page 128 and 129:
Table 1 - Installed electric power
Page 130 and 131:
Japan Consumers in Japan are suppli
Page 132 and 133:
BPE will be established not as a bi
Page 134 and 135:
Coal Coal fired power plants have b
Page 136 and 137:
A new sewage treatment plant with a
Page 138 and 139:
The interconnections between Portug
Page 140 and 141:
In order to respond to these basic
Page 142 and 143:
efficient energies and is reducing
Page 144 and 145:
Liberalisation Basic restructuring
Page 146 and 147:
External costs for electricity prod
Page 148 and 149:
At the beginning of plant operation
Page 150 and 151:
and high ash, moisture and sulphur
Page 152 and 153:
The White Paper did not contain pro
Page 154 and 155:
Table 7 shows the projected load fa
Page 156 and 157:
other investment options available
Page 158 and 159:
The impurities contained in coal ar
Page 160 and 161:
“ultra-supercritical” condition
Page 162 and 163:
unmineable coal seams. All three pr
Page 164 and 165:
Light water reactors require enrich
Page 166 and 167:
concerns. Consequently, the natural
Page 168 and 169:
generators and power electronics el
Page 170 and 171:
conventional fossil-fired plants. B
Page 172 and 173:
● ● very effective and is used
Page 175 and 176:
Appendix 5 Cost Estimation Methodol
Page 177:
into account in the real price of g
Page 180 and 181:
● ● ● ● Factors under the c
Page 182 and 183:
and small power plants. Although th
Page 184 and 185:
The general approach remains useful
Page 186 and 187:
Two US economic analyses of nuclear
Page 188 and 189:
assume future prices follow a rando
Page 190 and 191:
The effects of price risk on techno
Page 192 and 193:
The option to delay is embedded in
Page 195 and 196:
Appendix 7 Allocating the Costs and
Page 197 and 198:
Further Fourier’s law for heat tr
Page 199 and 200:
Figure A7.4 - The energy conversion
Page 201 and 202:
This yields: β = 0.153 α. If α e
Page 203:
It is emphasised that depending on
Page 206 and 207:
1 st oil shock 2 nd oil shock Saudi
Page 208 and 209:
Table A8.2 - Expected lower and upp
Page 210 and 211:
Reliability in electricity systems
Page 212 and 213:
is also highly dependent on the typ
Page 214 and 215:
In the ILEX study 5 and in another
Page 216 and 217:
an increasing share of wind is the
Page 218 and 219:
able to work out the optimal operat
Page 221 and 222:
Appendix 10 Impact of Carbon Emissi
Page 223 and 224:
costs of generation. The introducti
Page 225 and 226:
price at 3.5 €/GJ are the next fa
Page 227 and 228:
Figure A10.5 - Steam coal price var
Page 229 and 230:
The longer term impact on investmen
Page 231 and 232:
Appendix 11 List of Main Abbreviati
Page 233:
OECD PUBLICATIONS, 2 rue André-Pas
show all

Projected Costs of Generating Electricity - OECD Nuclear Energy ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?