- Page 1: NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY INTERNATIONAL
- Page 4: ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
- Page 10 and 11: Tables Table 2.1 Overview of respon
- Page 13 and 14: Executive Summary Executive Summary
- Page 15 and 16: Nuclear generating technologies For
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 1 Ba
- Page 19 and 20: Uncertainties in future demand and
- Page 21 and 22: International Energy Agency The IEA
- Page 23: series. Appendix 9 summarises the f
- Page 26 and 27: The costs reported are intended to
- Page 28 and 29: options for electricity generation
- Page 30 and 31: Table 2.3 - List of responses 1 Cou
- Page 32 and 33: Table 2.5 - Gas plant specification
- Page 34 and 35: Table 2.9 - Combined heat and power
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 3 Generation Costs of Coal-
- Page 39 and 40: Table 3.2 - Specific annual O&M cos
- Page 41 and 42: USD/MWh 70 60 Figure 3.3 - Levelise
- Page 43 and 44: Gas prices Table 3.6 summarises gas
- Page 45 and 46: Nuclear power plants Overnight cons
- Page 47 and 48: cost of nuclear generated electrici
- Page 49 and 50: In seven countries for one or more
- Page 51 and 52: Table 3.10 - Overnight construction
- Page 53 and 54: Table 3.13 - Projected generation c
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 4 Generation Costs of Wind,
- Page 57 and 58: % 50 40 Figure 4.2 - Capacity facto
- Page 59 and 60:
The availability/capacity factors r
- Page 61 and 62:
The availability/capacity factors r
- Page 63 and 64:
Table 4.5 - Projected generation co
- Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 5 Generation Costs of Combi
- Page 67 and 68:
not the same for an extraction plan
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 5.2 - Levelised costs of elec
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 6 Other Generation Technolo
- Page 73 and 74:
Waste incineration and landfill gas
- Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 7 Findings and Conclusions
- Page 77 and 78:
with other technologies is under st
- Page 79 and 80:
those alternatives based on the dat
- Page 81 and 82:
Appendix 1 App. 1 List of Members o
- Page 83 and 84:
Appendix 2 Factors Covered in Repor
- Page 85 and 86:
Table A2.2 - Nuclear plant O&M cost
- Page 87 and 88:
Table A2.5 - Coal-fired plant (incl
- Page 89 and 90:
Table A2.8 - Gas-fired (including C
- Page 91 and 92:
Table A2.11 - Wind plant O&M cost c
- Page 93 and 94:
Overnight Capital Costs: Constructi
- Page 95 and 96:
Appendix 3 Country Statements on Co
- Page 97 and 98:
Figures 2 and 3 give an overview of
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 5 - Electricity from renewab
- Page 101 and 102:
Belgium Legal and regulatory aspect
- Page 103 and 104:
Bearing in mind that the future dev
- Page 105 and 106:
● A new emphasis on the transmiss
- Page 107 and 108:
Conventional fossil based power Coa
- Page 109 and 110:
Assumptions regarding calorific val
- Page 111 and 112:
Finland The power sector The total
- Page 113 and 114:
France Summary of the DGEMP study o
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 3 - Sensitivity of productio
- Page 117 and 118:
€/MWh Figure 6 - Generating costs
- Page 119 and 120:
The aim of the Renewable Energy Sou
- Page 121 and 122:
While the biggest increase of insta
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 8 - Technical and economical
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 2 - Power generation costs a
- Page 127 and 128:
The most significant changes to the
- Page 129 and 130:
Italy The Italian electricity secto
- Page 131 and 132:
supercritical pressure steam cycle
- Page 133 and 134:
Current status of restructuring The
- Page 135 and 136:
in turn was based on the Eemshaven
- Page 137 and 138:
Portugal Legislative framework Curr
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 2 Mix of capacity in Portuga
- Page 141 and 142:
The regulated electricity market re
- Page 143 and 144:
Slovak Republic In the Slovak Repub
- Page 145 and 146:
Future of electricity supply The fu
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 1b - Generation costs at dif
- Page 149 and 150:
Turkey Turkey has been experiencing
- Page 151 and 152:
United Kingdom Introduction This no
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 4 presents projections of cap
- Page 155 and 156:
United States The cost of generatin
- Page 157 and 158:
Appendix 4 Generation Technology Th
- Page 159 and 160:
mechanically separate out the airbo
- Page 161 and 162:
Gas-fired power plants Combined cyc
- Page 163 and 164:
● Molten carbonate fuel cells: Th
- Page 165 and 166:
The development of advanced reactor
- Page 167 and 168:
The value of the hydro power produc
- Page 169 and 170:
30 years. PV is a form of distribut
- Page 171 and 172:
may be obtained by the process of f
- Page 173:
References BMWA (Federal Ministry o
- Page 176 and 177:
underlying the results are transpar
- Page 179 and 180:
Appendix 6 Methodologies Incorporat
- Page 181 and 182:
The situation for investors is furt
- Page 183 and 184:
power reduces the value of the powe
- Page 185 and 186:
that if the risk of the project in
- Page 187 and 188:
Probability and with exemption from
- Page 189 and 190:
Values in 10-8 3.0 Figure A6.2 - Di
- Page 191 and 192:
Values in 1O-10 Figure A6.5 - Distr
- Page 193:
US situation. Other markets, where
- Page 196 and 197:
Figure A7.1 The Carnot engine Figur
- Page 198 and 199:
This equation can be solved. It res
- Page 200 and 201:
Equation (19), in combination with
- Page 202 and 203:
e calculated in case that the machi
- Page 205 and 206:
Appendix 8 Fuel Price Trends and Pr
- Page 207 and 208:
Coal prices International steam-coa
- Page 209 and 210:
Appendix 9 Economic Impacts of Wind
- Page 211 and 212:
The amount of flexibility The abili
- Page 213 and 214:
flexible resources enabling it to h
- Page 215 and 216:
Thereby some of the capacity cost i
- Page 217 and 218:
The high dependency between costs o
- Page 219:
costs may perfectly be reflecting a
- Page 222 and 223:
The Kyoto Protocol and the European
- Page 224 and 225:
Short-run marginal costs were calcu
- Page 226 and 227:
Figure A10.4 also shows the changes
- Page 228 and 229:
If the CCGT plant’s efficiency ra
- Page 230 and 231:
Figure A10.8 - Comparison between c
- Page 232 and 233:
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Tech