08.05.2014 Views

Speculum - University of Melbourne

Speculum - University of Melbourne

Speculum - University of Melbourne

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36 SPECULUM<br />

emancipation. That day came in 1896,<br />

when Freda Gamble and Janet Greig, who<br />

had attended the <strong>Melbourne</strong> Hospital<br />

clinical school, finished their courses in<br />

fourth and sixth places, and applied for resident<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice at the hospital. The "Argus",<br />

which opposed the appointment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ladies, alleged that patients in the hospital,<br />

whether male or female, colonial born or<br />

English, were seething, and threatening to<br />

leave the wards to escape the touch <strong>of</strong> a<br />

woman. In other newspapers the ladies<br />

stated their case ably. Dr. Gamble said<br />

that the hospital should never have accepted<br />

their clinical fees if it did not intend to<br />

admit them to <strong>of</strong>fice once their examination<br />

results qualified them for appointment. The<br />

only case against them, she said, rested on<br />

prejudice and pr<strong>of</strong>essional jealousy: "We<br />

have beaten the men and they do not like<br />

it." The committee <strong>of</strong> management could<br />

not turn away these two applicants, graduates<br />

in its own hospital, as easily as it had<br />

rejected Dr. Stone. Some members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

committee had approved the appointment <strong>of</strong><br />

lady doctors even in 1892, when Dr. Whyte<br />

seemed likely to apply: "If ladies . . . suffered<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> conveniences," said a<br />

member who supported them, "then these<br />

were for the consideration <strong>of</strong> the ladies<br />

themselves." This attitude became more<br />

common in the hospital by 1896, especially<br />

as the two ladies had proved their competence.<br />

Others on the committee <strong>of</strong> management<br />

may have been intimidated by Dr.<br />

Gamble's charge that she and Dr. Greig<br />

could be refused only if it were true that<br />

the male rulers <strong>of</strong> the hospital resented their<br />

success. With varying degress <strong>of</strong> enthusiasm,<br />

the men <strong>of</strong> the hospital agreed to admit<br />

its first female medical <strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />

CITRADEX<br />

• THE MULTI-VITAMIN SYRUP<br />

WITH THE FRESH FRUIT<br />

FLAVOUR<br />

II ALL THE FAMILY WILL LIKE<br />

CITRADEX<br />

Another product <strong>of</strong> the<br />

GLAXO LABORATORIES<br />

Teaching at the hospital remained<br />

neither wholly incompetent nor wholly satisfactory.<br />

If they were attached to Williams<br />

or Fitzgerald, students could not help being<br />

instructed and inspired. In 1891, however,<br />

the city coroner, Dr. Richard Youl,<br />

who seldom criticised irresponsibility, was<br />

still able to remark that students at the hospital<br />

had to pick up knowledge as best they<br />

could. The cause was well known. Despite<br />

an improvement in its relations with<br />

the hospital, the university still had to<br />

choose its clinical lecturers from a body <strong>of</strong><br />

doctors whose election lay in the hands <strong>of</strong><br />

charitable subscribers. This obstacle was<br />

finally overcome in 1910, when the right to<br />

elect honorary medical <strong>of</strong>ficers passed from<br />

subscribers to the committee <strong>of</strong> management.<br />

The university council and the<br />

faculty <strong>of</strong> medicine were both represented<br />

after 1910 on an advisory board which was<br />

established to recommend candidates for<br />

election. The hospital and the university<br />

could at last work closely together in the<br />

training <strong>of</strong> doctors, for students could now<br />

be given clinical instruction by honorary<br />

medical <strong>of</strong>ficers appointed for their skill as<br />

teachers. An <strong>of</strong>ficial channel joined theory<br />

and practice in the medical course.<br />

Yet, despite the caprice <strong>of</strong> the old electoral<br />

system, teaching at the hospital improved<br />

remarkably between 1900 and<br />

1910, owing to the ability and devotion <strong>of</strong><br />

particular teachers. Williams was no longer<br />

very active, but there were now more men<br />

at the hospital who shared his mastery <strong>of</strong><br />

two sets <strong>of</strong> techniques—who were able<br />

practitioners and successful teachers.<br />

Among the surgeons, G. A. Syme, G. C.<br />

Rennie, F. D. Bird and R. A. Stirling had<br />

replaced the men who fought out the<br />

Listerian controversy; each <strong>of</strong> them taught<br />

his students as capably as he tended his<br />

patients. But it was a physician, Dr. R. R.<br />

Stawell, who made the greatest impact on<br />

the hospital clinical school. Like his contemporary,<br />

Henry Maudsley, Stawell owed<br />

much <strong>of</strong> his skill as a teaching physician to<br />

post-graduate training at <strong>University</strong> College,<br />

London, which had the only medical<br />

school in England comparable with those in<br />

Scottish and European universities. Sir<br />

Alan Newton spoke thus <strong>of</strong> Stawell's English<br />

training during his Stawell Oration in<br />

1947: "He returned from England in the<br />

'nineties <strong>of</strong> the last century, deeply

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!