23.05.2014 Views

Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity

Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity

Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

At lower temperatures, details become resolved that are obscured by thermal broadening at high T . The RPA<br />

and also more advanced approaches are very sensitive to the electronic bands close to the Fermi energy; states<br />

with |ξ k | ≫ k B T have exponentially small effect on the susceptibility. Therefore, the detailed susceptibility at low<br />

T strongly depends on details <strong>of</strong> the model Hamiltonian. Choosing nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor<br />

hopping in such a way that a realistic Fermi surface emerges, one obtains a spin susceptiblity with incommensurate<br />

q<br />

0<br />

π a<br />

peaks at π a (1, 1 ± δ) and π a (1 ± δ, 1). y<br />

π a<br />

q x<br />

These peaks are due to nesting: Scattering is enhanced between parallel portions <strong>of</strong> the Fermi surface, which in<br />

turn enhances the susceptibility [see M. Norman, Phys. Rev. B 75, 184514 (2007)].<br />

k y<br />

π<br />

a<br />

π<br />

a (1− δ , 1)<br />

π<br />

a (1, 1− δ )<br />

π<br />

a<br />

k x<br />

The results for the spin susceptibility are in qualitative agreement with neutron-scattering experiments. However,<br />

the RPA overestimates the tendency toward magnetic order, which is reduced by more advanced approaches.<br />

Spin-fluctuation exchange<br />

The next step is to construct an effective electron-electron interaction mediated by the exchange <strong>of</strong> spin fluctuations.<br />

The following diagrammatic series represents the simplest way <strong>of</strong> doing this, though certainly not the only<br />

one:<br />

V eff :=<br />

U<br />

+ + + · · · (12.35)<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!