Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
a restriction <strong>of</strong> our variational ansatz. Then we obtain<br />
⟨ψ BCS |H| ψ BCS ⟩ = ∑ kσ<br />
+ 1 N<br />
ξ k ⟨0| ∏ q<br />
∑<br />
kk ′ V kk ′ ⟨0| ∏ q<br />
(<br />
u<br />
∗<br />
q + v ∗ q c −q,↓ c q↑<br />
)<br />
c<br />
†<br />
kσ c kσ<br />
∏ (<br />
)<br />
u q ′ + v q ′ c † q ′ ↑ c† −q ′ ,↓<br />
|0⟩<br />
q ′<br />
(<br />
u<br />
∗<br />
q + v ∗ q c −q,↓ c q↑<br />
)<br />
c<br />
†<br />
k↑ c† −k,↓ c −k ′ ↓c k′ ↑<br />
∏ (<br />
)<br />
u q ′ + v q ′ c † q ′ ↑ c† −q ′ ,↓<br />
|0⟩<br />
q ′<br />
= ∑ ξ k ⟨0| |v k | 2 c −k,↓ c k↑ c † k↑ c k↑c † k↑ c† −k,↓ |0⟩ + ∑ ξ k ⟨0| |v −k | 2 c k↓ c −k,↑ c † k↓ c k↓c † −k,↑ c† k↓ |0⟩<br />
k<br />
k<br />
+ 1 ∑<br />
V kk ′ ⟨0| v<br />
N<br />
ku ∗ ∗ k ′u kv k ′ c −k,↓ c k↑ c † k↑ c† −k,↓ c −k ′ ,↓c k′ ↑c † k ′ ↑ c† −k ′ ,↓ |0⟩<br />
kk ′<br />
= ∑ 2ξ k |v k | 2 + 1 ∑<br />
V kk ′ v<br />
N<br />
ku ∗ k u ∗ k ′v k ′ =: E BCS. (9.20)<br />
k<br />
kk ′<br />
This energy should be minimized with respect to the u k , v k . For E BCS to be real, the phases <strong>of</strong> u k and v k must<br />
be the same. But since E BCS is invariant under<br />
u k → u k e iφ k<br />
, v k → v k e iφ k<br />
, (9.21)<br />
we can choose all u k , v k real. The constraint from normalization then reads u 2 k + v2 k<br />
= 1 and we can parametrize<br />
the coefficients by<br />
u k = cos θ k , v k = sin θ k . (9.22)<br />
Then<br />
We obtain the minimum from<br />
∂E BCS<br />
∂θ q<br />
We replace q by k and parametrize θ k by<br />
E BCS = ∑ 2ξ k sin 2 θ k + 1 ∑<br />
V kk ′ sin θ k cos θ k sin θ k ′ cos θ k ′<br />
N<br />
k<br />
kk ′<br />
= ∑ ξ k (1 − cos 2θ k ) + 1 ∑ V kk ′<br />
sin 2θ k sin 2θ k ′. (9.23)<br />
N 4<br />
k<br />
kk ′<br />
= 2ξ q sin 2θ q + 1 ∑ V qk ′<br />
cos 2θ q sin 2θ k ′ + 1 ∑<br />
N 2<br />
N<br />
k ′ k<br />
= 2ξ q sin 2θ q + 1 ∑<br />
V qk ′ cos 2θ q sin 2θ k ′<br />
N<br />
k ′<br />
V kq<br />
2 sin 2θ k cos 2θ q<br />
!<br />
= 0. (9.24)<br />
sin 2θ k =:<br />
∆ k<br />
√<br />
ξ<br />
2<br />
k<br />
+ ∆ 2 k<br />
(9.25)<br />
and write<br />
cos 2θ k =<br />
ξ<br />
√ k<br />
. (9.26)<br />
ξ<br />
2<br />
k<br />
+ ∆ 2 k<br />
The last equality is only determined by the previous one up to the sign. We could convince ourselves that the<br />
other possible choice does not lead to a lower E BCS . Equation (9.24) now becomes<br />
⇒<br />
2<br />
ξ k ∆<br />
√ k<br />
+ 1 ∑<br />
ξ<br />
2<br />
k<br />
+ ∆ 2 N<br />
k<br />
∑<br />
∆ k = − 1 N<br />
k ′ V kk ′<br />
k ′ V kk ′<br />
ξ k ∆ k ′<br />
√<br />
ξ<br />
2<br />
k<br />
+ ∆ 2 k√<br />
ξ<br />
2<br />
k ′ + ∆ 2 k ′ = 0 (9.27)<br />
∆ k ′<br />
2 √ ξ 2 k ′ + ∆ 2 k ′ . (9.28)<br />
86