23.05.2014 Views

Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity

Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity

Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10.2 Isotope effect<br />

How can one check that <strong>superconductivity</strong> is indeed governed by a phonon-mediated interaction? BCS theory<br />

predicts<br />

(<br />

)<br />

1<br />

k B T c , ∆ 0 ∝ ω D exp −<br />

. (10.49)<br />

V 0 D(E F )<br />

It would be ideal to compare k B T c or ∆ 0 for superconductors that only differ in the Debye frequency ω D , not in<br />

V 0 <strong>of</strong> D(E F ). This is at least approximately possible by using samples containing different isotopes (or different<br />

fractions <strong>of</strong> isotopes) <strong>of</strong> the same elements.<br />

The eigenfrequency <strong>of</strong> a harmonic oscillator scales with the mass like<br />

ω ∼ 1 √ m<br />

. (10.50)<br />

The entire phonon dispersion, and thus in particular the Debye frequency, also scales like<br />

ω qλ ∼ 1 √<br />

M<br />

, ω D ∼ 1 √<br />

M<br />

(10.51)<br />

with the atomic mass M for an elementary superconductor. The same scaling has been found above for the<br />

jellium model, see Eq. (8.73). Consequently, for elementary BCS weak-coupling superconductors,<br />

k B T c , ∆ 0 ∼ M −α with α = 1 2 . (10.52)<br />

This is indeed found for simple superconductors. The exponent is found to be smaller or even negative for materials<br />

that are not in the weak-coupling regime V D(E F ) ≪ 1 or that are not phonon-mediated superconductors. In<br />

particular, if the relevant interaction has nothing to do with phonons, we expect α = 0. This is observed for<br />

optimally doped (highest T c ) cuprate high-temperature superconductors.<br />

10.3 Specific heat<br />

We now discuss further predictions following from BCS theory. We start by revisiting the heat capacity or specific<br />

heat. The BCS Hamiltonian<br />

H BCS = E BCS + ∑ E k γ † kσ γ kσ (10.53)<br />

kσ<br />

with<br />

leads to the internal energy<br />

E k =<br />

U = ⟨H BCS ⟩ = E BCS + 2 ∑ k<br />

√<br />

ξ 2 k + |∆ k| 2 (10.54)<br />

E k n F (E k ). (10.55)<br />

However, this is inconvenient for the calculation <strong>of</strong> the heat capacity C = dU/dT since the condensate energy<br />

E BCS depends on temperature through ⟨c −k,↓ c k↑ ⟩. We better consider the entropy, which has no contribution<br />

from the condensate. It reads<br />

∑<br />

S = −k B [(1 − n F ) ln(1 − n F ) + n F ln n F ], (10.56)<br />

where n F ≡ n F (E k ). From the entropy, we obtain the heat capacity<br />

kσ<br />

C = T dS dS<br />

= −β<br />

dT dβ<br />

= 2k B β ∑ d<br />

dβ [(1 − n F ) ln(1 − n F ) + n F ln n F ] = 2k B β ∑ dn F<br />

[− ln(1 − n F ) − 1 + ln n F + 1]<br />

} {{ } dβ<br />

k<br />

k<br />

= ln n F<br />

1−n = ln e −βE k = −βE k F<br />

= −2k B β 2 ∑ k<br />

d n F (E k )<br />

E k . (10.57)<br />

dβ<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!