Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10.2 Isotope effect<br />
How can one check that <strong>superconductivity</strong> is indeed governed by a phonon-mediated interaction? BCS theory<br />
predicts<br />
(<br />
)<br />
1<br />
k B T c , ∆ 0 ∝ ω D exp −<br />
. (10.49)<br />
V 0 D(E F )<br />
It would be ideal to compare k B T c or ∆ 0 for superconductors that only differ in the Debye frequency ω D , not in<br />
V 0 <strong>of</strong> D(E F ). This is at least approximately possible by using samples containing different isotopes (or different<br />
fractions <strong>of</strong> isotopes) <strong>of</strong> the same elements.<br />
The eigenfrequency <strong>of</strong> a harmonic oscillator scales with the mass like<br />
ω ∼ 1 √ m<br />
. (10.50)<br />
The entire phonon dispersion, and thus in particular the Debye frequency, also scales like<br />
ω qλ ∼ 1 √<br />
M<br />
, ω D ∼ 1 √<br />
M<br />
(10.51)<br />
with the atomic mass M for an elementary superconductor. The same scaling has been found above for the<br />
jellium model, see Eq. (8.73). Consequently, for elementary BCS weak-coupling superconductors,<br />
k B T c , ∆ 0 ∼ M −α with α = 1 2 . (10.52)<br />
This is indeed found for simple superconductors. The exponent is found to be smaller or even negative for materials<br />
that are not in the weak-coupling regime V D(E F ) ≪ 1 or that are not phonon-mediated superconductors. In<br />
particular, if the relevant interaction has nothing to do with phonons, we expect α = 0. This is observed for<br />
optimally doped (highest T c ) cuprate high-temperature superconductors.<br />
10.3 Specific heat<br />
We now discuss further predictions following from BCS theory. We start by revisiting the heat capacity or specific<br />
heat. The BCS Hamiltonian<br />
H BCS = E BCS + ∑ E k γ † kσ γ kσ (10.53)<br />
kσ<br />
with<br />
leads to the internal energy<br />
E k =<br />
U = ⟨H BCS ⟩ = E BCS + 2 ∑ k<br />
√<br />
ξ 2 k + |∆ k| 2 (10.54)<br />
E k n F (E k ). (10.55)<br />
However, this is inconvenient for the calculation <strong>of</strong> the heat capacity C = dU/dT since the condensate energy<br />
E BCS depends on temperature through ⟨c −k,↓ c k↑ ⟩. We better consider the entropy, which has no contribution<br />
from the condensate. It reads<br />
∑<br />
S = −k B [(1 − n F ) ln(1 − n F ) + n F ln n F ], (10.56)<br />
where n F ≡ n F (E k ). From the entropy, we obtain the heat capacity<br />
kσ<br />
C = T dS dS<br />
= −β<br />
dT dβ<br />
= 2k B β ∑ d<br />
dβ [(1 − n F ) ln(1 − n F ) + n F ln n F ] = 2k B β ∑ dn F<br />
[− ln(1 − n F ) − 1 + ln n F + 1]<br />
} {{ } dβ<br />
k<br />
k<br />
= ln n F<br />
1−n = ln e −βE k = −βE k F<br />
= −2k B β 2 ∑ k<br />
d n F (E k )<br />
E k . (10.57)<br />
dβ<br />
95