Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
with<br />
η = − 1 k B T β<br />
> 0. (7.11)<br />
4π γα<br />
Thus the correlation function <strong>of</strong> the order parameters decays like a power law <strong>of</strong> distance in two dimensions. We do<br />
not find long-range order, which would imply lim r→∞ ⟨ψ(r) ∗ ψ(0)⟩ = const. This agrees with the Mermin-Wagner<br />
theorem, which forbids long-range order for the two-dimensional superfluid. The power-law decay characterizes<br />
so-called quasi-long-range order (short range order would have an even faster, e.g., exponential, decay).<br />
Isolated vortices<br />
We have argued that fluctuations in the amplitude are less important because they have an energy gap proportional<br />
to −2α > 0. This is indeed true for small amplitude fluctuations. However, there exist variations <strong>of</strong> the amplitude<br />
that are, while energetically costly, very stable once they have been created. These are vortices. In two dimensions,<br />
a vortex is a zero-dimensional object; the order parameter goes to zero at a single point at its center. The simplest<br />
form <strong>of</strong> a vortex at the origin can be represented by<br />
ψ(r) = |ψ(r)| e iϕ(r) = |ψ(r)| e i(φ−φ 0) , (7.12)<br />
where r and φ are (planar) polar coordinates <strong>of</strong> r. An antivortex would be described by<br />
ψ(r) = |ψ(r)| e −i(φ−φ 0) . (7.13)<br />
In both cases, lim r→0 |ψ(r)| = 0. Note that we have changed the convention for the sign in the exponent compared<br />
to superconducting vortices.<br />
In the presence <strong>of</strong> vortices, the phase ϕ(r) <strong>of</strong> the order parameter is multivalued and, <strong>of</strong> course, undefined at<br />
the vortex centers. On the other hand, the phase gradient v = ∇ϕ is single-valued (but still undefined at the<br />
vortex centers). For any closed loop C not touching any vortex cores, we have<br />
∮<br />
ds · v = total change in phase along C = 2π N C , (7.14)<br />
C<br />
where N C ∈ Z is the enclosed winding number or vorticity. The vorticity can be written as the sum <strong>of</strong> the<br />
vorticities N i = ±1 <strong>of</strong> all vortices and antivortices inside the loop,<br />
N C = ∑ i<br />
N i . (7.15)<br />
N = +1<br />
1<br />
N = +1<br />
2<br />
N = −1<br />
3<br />
Defining the vortex concentration by<br />
n v (r) := ∑ i<br />
N i δ(r − R i ), (7.16)<br />
where R i is the location <strong>of</strong> the center <strong>of</strong> vortex i, we obtain<br />
∇ × v ≡ ∂<br />
∂x v y − ∂ ∂y v x = 2π n v (r). (7.17)<br />
54