23.05.2014 Views

Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity

Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity

Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Gibbs free energy <strong>of</strong> the domain wall, per unit area, will be denoted by γ. To derive it, first note that for the<br />

given boundary conditions, g s (x → ∞) = g n (x → −∞), i.e., the superconducting free-energy density deep inside<br />

the superconductor equals the normal free-energy density deep inside the normal conductor. This bulk Gibbs<br />

free-energy density is, as derived above,<br />

g s (x → ∞) = g n (x → −∞) = f n (x → −∞) − H2 c<br />

8π = −H2 c<br />

8π . (6.84)<br />

The additional free-energy density due to the domain wall is<br />

( )<br />

g s (x) − − H2 c<br />

= g s (x) + H2 c<br />

8π<br />

8π . (6.85)<br />

The corresponding free energy per area is<br />

γ =<br />

=<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

[<br />

]<br />

dx g s (x) + H2 c<br />

=<br />

8π<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

[<br />

dx α |ψ| 2 + β 2 |ψ|4 + 1 ∣( ∣∣∣ <br />

2m ∗ i<br />

[<br />

dx f s (x) − B(x)H ]<br />

c<br />

+ H2 c<br />

4π 8π<br />

∂<br />

∂x − q )<br />

c A(x)<br />

ψ<br />

∣<br />

8π − BH ]<br />

c<br />

4π<br />

+ H2 c<br />

. (6.86)<br />

} {{<br />

8π<br />

}<br />

= (B−H c) 2 /8π<br />

2<br />

+ B2<br />

We can simplify this by multiplying the first Ginzburg-Landau equation (6.45) by ψ ∗ and integrating over x:<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

dx<br />

by parts<br />

=<br />

=<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

[<br />

α |ψ| 2 + β |ψ| 4 + 1 ( ∂<br />

2m ∗ ψ∗ i ∂x − q ) ] 2<br />

c A(x) ψ<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

[<br />

dx α |ψ| 2 + β |ψ| 4 + 1 (− 2m ∗ i<br />

∂<br />

∂x − q ) ( <br />

c A(x) ψ ∗ (x)<br />

i<br />

∂<br />

∂x − q ) ]<br />

c A(x) ψ<br />

[<br />

dx α |ψ| 2 + β |ψ| 4 + 1 ∣( ∣∣∣ ∂<br />

2m ∗ i ∂x − q )<br />

c A(x) ]<br />

ψ∣<br />

= 0. (6.87)<br />

∣2<br />

Thus<br />

∫ ∞<br />

γ = dx<br />

[− β 2 |ψ|4 + (B − H c) 2 ]<br />

8π<br />

−∞<br />

= H2 c<br />

8π<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

= H2 c<br />

8π<br />

∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

[<br />

dx −β β α 2 |ψ|4 +<br />

(1 − B ) ] 2<br />

H c<br />

[ (<br />

dx 1 − B ) ]<br />

2<br />

− |ψ|4 , (6.88)<br />

H c<br />

ψ 4 ∞<br />

where we have drawn out the characteristic energy density H 2 c /8π. The domain wall energy is given by the difference<br />

<strong>of</strong> the energy cost <strong>of</strong> expelling the magnetic field and the energy gain due to superconducting condensation.<br />

For strong type-I superconductors, ξ ≫ λ; there is a region <strong>of</strong> thickness ξ − λ > 0 in which the first term is<br />

already large, while the second only slowly approaches its bulk value (see sketch above). Thus γ > 0 for type-I<br />

superconductors. They therefore tend to minimize the total area <strong>of</strong> domain walls.<br />

Note that even in samples <strong>of</strong> relatively simple shape, magnetic flux will penetrate for non-zero applied field. It<br />

will do so in a way that minimizes the total Gibbs free energy, only one contribution to which is the domain-wall<br />

energy. For example in a very large slab perpendicular to the applied field, the flux has to penetrate in some<br />

manner, since going around the large sample would cost much energy. A careful analysis shows that this will<br />

usually happen in the form <strong>of</strong> normal stripes separated by superconducting stripes, see Tinkham’s book. Such a<br />

state is called an intermediate state. It should not be confused with the vortex state to be discussed later.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!