Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Carsten Timm: Theory of superconductivity
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The constant is irrelevant for the following derivation and is omitted from now on. Since H BCS is bilinear in c, c †<br />
it describes a non-interacting effective system. But what is unusual is that H BCS contains terms <strong>of</strong> the form cc<br />
and c † c † , which do not conserve the electron number. We thus expect that the eigenstates <strong>of</strong> H BCS do not have a<br />
sharp electron number. We had already seen that the BCS ground state has this property. This is a bit strange<br />
since superpositions <strong>of</strong> states with different electron numbers are never observed. One can formulate the theory<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>superconductivity</strong> in terms <strong>of</strong> states with fixed electron number, but this formulation is cumbersome and we<br />
will not pursue it here.<br />
To diagonalize H BCS , we introduce new fermionic operators, which are linear combinations <strong>of</strong> electron creation<br />
and annihilation operators,<br />
(<br />
γk↑<br />
γ † −k,↓<br />
) ( u<br />
∗<br />
= k<br />
−v k<br />
v ∗ k<br />
u k<br />
) (<br />
ck↑<br />
c † −k,↓<br />
)<br />
. (10.8)<br />
This mapping is called Bogoliubov (or Bogoliubov-Valatin) transformation. Again, it is not clear yet that u k , v k<br />
are related to the previously introduced quantities denoted by the same symbols. For the γ to satisfy fermionic<br />
anticommutation relations, we require<br />
{ }<br />
γ k↑ , γ † k↑<br />
= γ k↑ γ † k↑ + γ† k↑ γ k↑<br />
= u ∗ ku k c k↑ c † k↑ − u∗ kv ∗ k c k↑ c −k,↓ − v k u k c † −k,↓ c† k↑ + v kv ∗ k c † −k,↓ c −k,↓<br />
+ u k u ∗ k c † k↑ c k↑ − u k v k c † k↑ c† −k,↓ − v∗ ku ∗ k c −k,↓ c k↑ + vkv ∗ k c −k,↓ c †<br />
{ −k,↓<br />
}<br />
}<br />
= |u k | 2 c k↑ , c † k↑<br />
−u ∗ kvk ∗ {c k↑ , c −k,↓ } −v k u k<br />
{c { }<br />
†<br />
−k,↓<br />
} {{ } } {{ }<br />
, c† k↑<br />
+ |v k | 2 c † −k,↓ , c −k,↓<br />
} {{ } } {{ }<br />
= 0<br />
= 1<br />
= 0<br />
= 1<br />
= |u k | 2 + |v k | 2 ! = 1. (10.9)<br />
Using this constraint, we find the inverse transformation,<br />
( ) ( ) (<br />
ck↑ uk v<br />
=<br />
k γk↑<br />
c † −k,↓<br />
−v ∗ k<br />
u ∗ k<br />
γ † −k,↓<br />
)<br />
. (10.10)<br />
Insertion into H BCS yields<br />
H BCS = ∑ ) (<br />
) (<br />
) )<br />
{ξ k<br />
(u ∗ kγ † k↑ + v∗ kγ −k,↓ u k γ k↑ + v k γ † −k,↓<br />
+ ξ k −vkγ ∗ k↑ + u ∗ kγ † −k,↓<br />
(−v k γ † k↑ + u kγ −k,↓<br />
k<br />
) (<br />
) ) (<br />
)}<br />
−∆ ∗ k<br />
(−v k γ † k↑ + u kγ −k,↓ u k γ k↑ + v k γ † −k,↓<br />
− ∆ k<br />
(u ∗ kγ † k↑ + v∗ kγ −k,↓ −vkγ ∗ k↑ + u ∗ kγ † −k,↓<br />
= ∑ {(<br />
)<br />
ξ k |u k | 2 − ξ k |v k | 2 + ∆ ∗ kv k u k + ∆ k u ∗ kvk<br />
∗ γ † k↑ γ k↑<br />
k<br />
(<br />
+<br />
(<br />
+<br />
+<br />
)<br />
−ξ k |v k | 2 + ξ k |u k | 2 + ∆ ∗ ku k v k + ∆ k vku ∗ ∗ k γ † −k,↓ γ −k,↓<br />
ξ k u ∗ kv k + ξ k u ∗ kv k + ∆ ∗ kvk 2 − ∆ k (u ∗ k) 2) γ † k↑ γ† −k,↓<br />
(ξ k vku ∗ k + ξ k vku ∗ k − ∆ ∗ ku 2 k + ∆ k (vk) ∗ 2) }<br />
γ −k,↓ γ k↑ + const. (10.11)<br />
The coefficients u k , v k should now be chosen such that the γγ and γ † γ † terms vanish. This requires<br />
Writing<br />
2ξ k u ∗ kv k + ∆ ∗ kv 2 k − ∆ k (u ∗ k) 2 = 0. (10.12)<br />
∆ k = |∆ k | e iϕ k<br />
, (10.13)<br />
u k = |u k | e iα k<br />
, (10.14)<br />
v k = |v k | e iβ k<br />
, (10.15)<br />
90