Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
94 Kammila Naidoo<br />
that countries with underdeveloped economies, hindered by<br />
constraints which kept fertility high, would in time follow the trend<br />
of European countries that had experienced incipient mortality and<br />
fertility decline. When historical evidence failed to support this<br />
assumption the focus turned to broadly-defined ‘cultural’ variables<br />
such as language, religious affiliation and women’s education and to<br />
alternative explanations such as those linked to diffusionism and<br />
‘ideational change’ 4 — as well as the New Household Economics<br />
arguments linking demand for children to ‘costs’ and ‘prices’. 5 An<br />
exhaustive overview of contending and contesting positions is not<br />
possible here. However, it might be important to note that whilst the<br />
assumptions of structural change of classic transition theory were<br />
superseded by often more micro-level and household based analyses,<br />
these were still located within the framework of modernist arguments<br />
about rational decision-making on family size and the roles of<br />
knowledge, modern values and new technologies and their<br />
contribution to declining fertility rates. What remained absent was<br />
more meaningful and complex treatment of ‘women’ or ‘gender’ in<br />
the demographic literature. Whilst statistics ‘on women’ increased in<br />
volume the emphasis initially was largely on descriptions of ‘women’s<br />
role’ and ‘women’s status’ notwithstanding the fact that both<br />
concepts were being severely criticised within feminist discourse. 6<br />
More crucial shortcomings, though, relate to the fact that<br />
reproductive behaviour and fertility outcomes were rarely studied<br />
within the context of power inequalities at the societal and domestic<br />
level or as a consequence of conflicting gender interests. 7 Nor was it<br />
common to see efforts at ‘situating fertility’, that is, ‘to show how it<br />
makes sense given the socio-cultural and political economic context<br />
in which it is embedded’. 8<br />
African reproductive regimes are commonly discussed as fertility<br />
maximising regimes reflecting universal marriage, high values placed<br />
on large families, resistance to fertility limitation and consequently<br />
strong desires for large numbers of children. 9 However, in the 1990s<br />
the signs of declining fertility in many African countries raised<br />
questions about many of the assumptions and preconceived notions of<br />
African fertility. Debate raged on about the particularities of fertility<br />
4<br />
J Cleland & C Wilson ‘Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic<br />
view’ (1987) Population Studies 5 42.<br />
5 G Becker ‘An economic analysis of fertility’ in National bureau of economic<br />
research, demographic change and economic change in developed countries<br />
(1960) 10.<br />
6 S Greenhalgh ‘Anthropology theorises reproduction: Integrating practice, political<br />
economic, and feminist perspectives’ in S Greenhalgh (ed) Situating fertility:<br />
Anthropology and demographic inquiry (1995) 157.<br />
7 N Kabeer Reversed realities. <strong>Gender</strong> hierarchies in development thought (1994).<br />
8<br />
S Greenhalgh in Greenhalgh (n 5 above) 17.<br />
9 RJ Lesthaeghe Reproduction and social organization in sub-Saharan Africa (1989).