Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8 Amanda du Preez<br />
categories almost beyond recognition. Answering questions such as<br />
‘what is a woman?’ and ‘what is a man?’ has become exceedingly<br />
complex; no definite answer is possible without building in the<br />
nuances of embodied realities as well. The position I take is to<br />
acknowledge the constructed nature of both sex and gender, without<br />
disregarding the situated specificity of embodiment. Accordingly,<br />
becoming a ‘man’ or a ‘woman’ is a never-ending process that is also<br />
always already embodied.<br />
It has to be reiterated that the short history of transsexualism is<br />
intimately entangled with technological and medical advancements<br />
such as hormonal therapy or endocrinology and reassignment surgery<br />
technologies, including vaginoplasty 25 and phalloplasty. 26 The<br />
techno-medical history of sex reassignment procedures and the<br />
growth of the transsexual category are intertwined to such a degree<br />
that it is difficult to separate the two meaningfully. It was also in the<br />
mid-twentieth century that the term ‘gender’ was created to<br />
‘manage’ the occurrence of both intersexuality 27 and transsexuality<br />
within medical discourses. Obviously these discourses struggled to<br />
cope with the constructedness of sex and required another level of<br />
interpretation to unravel the mystery of transsexuality; hence, the<br />
category of gender 28 was created. <strong>Gender</strong> emerges, thus, as byproduct<br />
of deviant sexual categories.<br />
Although the so-called inevitability of medical intervention and the<br />
pathological status of transsexuality are substantially challenged in<br />
current debates on transsexuality, such as Sandy Stone’s<br />
‘Posttranssexual manifesto’, 29 most discourses on the topic do call on<br />
technology uncritically to construct agency.<br />
25 Vaginoplasty is the surgical procedure of constructing a vagina. The most common<br />
procedure utilises the skin of the penis for the lining of the new vagina and<br />
retains a portion of the erogenous tissue from the base of the penis for the<br />
clitoris. See Hausman (n 1 above) 68.<br />
26<br />
Phalloplasty involves the surgical construction of a penis by means of the tubed<br />
pedicle flap; Hausman (n 1 above) 67.<br />
27 Intersexuality refers to persons born with genitals that are neither clearly male<br />
nor clearly female and is the term that is now preferred to ‘hermaphrodite’.<br />
‘True’ intersexed individuals, where both ovarian and testicular tissue are present<br />
in either the same gonad or in opposite gonads, accounts for less than 5 percent<br />
of all cases of ambiguous genitals (SJ Kessler ‘The medical construction of gender.<br />
Case management of intersexed infants’ in PD Hopkins (ed) <strong>Sex</strong>/machine.<br />
Readings in culture, gender, and technology (1998) 241 242). For the specific role<br />
played by the medical profession and the creation and maintenance of these<br />
categories, see AD Dreger Hermaphrodites and the medical invention of sex<br />
(1998); Kessler (above).<br />
28<br />
In this regard Bernice Hausman makes a convincing argument against Butler’s use<br />
of gender as the creator of sex, by showing that gender is not a transhistorical<br />
concept, but, indeed, a term with a very specific history and context for its<br />
creation. See Hausman (n 1 above) 180-182.<br />
29 Stone (n 11 above).