Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
44 stella viljoen<br />
to be more overtly sophisticated. This effort toward creating an<br />
urbane tone is related to the magazine’s brand differentiation<br />
strategy. GQ, for instance, procures more advertising from luxury<br />
brands than FHM. According to Sean Couves, 7 a former marketing<br />
manager for GQ South Africa, this is due to the fact that GQ is<br />
considered to be less laddish. Nevertheless, these differences are<br />
marginal and GQ, thus, forms a purposive sample of glossy men’s<br />
magazines as a genre.<br />
In a sense, this study has failed before it has even started, for by<br />
investigating GQ and then capturing this process in writing, one is<br />
removing the magazine from the very real context in which it is made<br />
and distributed (the studio, factory, newsagent, home, and so on).<br />
Language, nevertheless, plays a critical role in invoking public<br />
awareness and responsibility (in terms of the content of popular<br />
culture). In order to stress this role, the emphasis of this chapter is<br />
firstly on the process of defining the new, hybrid form of pornography<br />
that is glossy men’s magazines. Towards this end, the term<br />
‘gentlemen’s pornography’ is proposed as an rhetorical gimmick to<br />
emphasise the manner in which GQ aesthetically borrows from<br />
canonical erotic art in order to disguise its objectification of women.<br />
Secondly, this chapter comprises a semiotic investigation of the<br />
stylised aesthetic veneer that typifies glossy men’s magazines.<br />
Feminist discourse is divided on the potential harmfulness of<br />
pornography. This analysis builds on the assumptions of feminists such<br />
as Laura Mulvey 8 who have highlighted the potential for<br />
objectification contained within the artistic or mechanical process<br />
employed in art, photography and popular magazines. This chapter,<br />
in other words, builds on the assumption that novel strains of<br />
aestheticised objectification are worthy subjects of investigation<br />
because of their stereotypical representation of gender.<br />
2. Gentlemen's pornography<br />
In the nineteenth century, Alphonse de Lamartine commented: ‘One<br />
feels, one knows, one lives and at need, one dies for one's cause, but<br />
one cannot name it. It is the problem of this time to classify things<br />
and men... The world has jumbled its catalogue’. 9 Into the ‘jumbled<br />
catalogue’ of visual rhetoric this article introduces yet another tag,<br />
namely ‘gentlemen's pornography’. It is an awkward, ambivalent<br />
phrase that is an inadequate signifier for the irony that defines this<br />
taxonomy, but it is nevertheless useful in the absence of a more<br />
erudite (or politically correct) one. Gentlemen's pornography is a<br />
7 S Couves, personal interview (2002).<br />
8<br />
L Mulvey Visual and other pleasures (1989).<br />
9 N Harris Beliefs in society (1968) 24.