Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
Sex, Gender, Becoming - PULP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Three / The aspirational aesthetics<br />
of ‘Gentlemen’s<br />
1<br />
pornography’ Stella Viljoen<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The rising popularity of ‘glossy men's magazines’ in South Africa is all<br />
too clear with the emergence of the South African issues of<br />
Gentlemen's Quarterly (GQ), For Him Magazine (FHM) and Maxim in<br />
the past decade. This chapter examines the visual and social<br />
mythology that gave rise to this new brand of objectifying imagery,<br />
and proposes a new term for this more elusive pornographic genre.<br />
In 1953, Hugh Hefner launched the first so-called soft-porn magazine<br />
targeted at upwardly mobile men. Playboy (it was originally going to<br />
be called Stag Night), was similar to other pornography in that it<br />
objectified women for the purposes of male pleasure, but unlike its<br />
various predecessors it also included what Gail Dines 2 terms ‘service<br />
features’ on sexy consumables, current events, advice columns,<br />
reviews, interviews and short stories. The much-imitated genre of<br />
soft (softer and softest) pornography is no longer the novelty it was in<br />
the 1950s, but has grown to a billion dollar industry with manifold<br />
faces. The political and economic valorisations that have fed and<br />
milked this cash cow are in part also responsible for the continued<br />
ennobling of female objectification that forms a kind of Ariadnian<br />
thread throughout the history of western visual representation.<br />
Pornography, whether subtle or explicit, is not a contemporary<br />
phenomenon; it has a long and politically diverse history. 3 Since the<br />
‘erotic’, similarly, seems to have existed throughout western<br />
history, it too may seem to be a transhistorical concept. However, it<br />
was specifically in the nineteenth century that the pornographic was<br />
categorised as separate and distinct from the erotic, and it is in this<br />
1 This chapter is based on a conference paper delivered at the annual Design<br />
History Society Conference (Norwich, UK) in September 2003 and was posted on<br />
the African <strong>Gender</strong> Institute’s <strong>Gender</strong> and Women’s Studies website (http://<br />
www.gwsafrica.org/knowledge/manet.html) in 2004.<br />
2<br />
G Dines ‘I buy it for the articles: Playboy Magazine and the sexualisation of<br />
consumerism’ in G Dines & JM Humez (eds) <strong>Gender</strong>, race and class in media, a<br />
text reader (1995) 254 255.<br />
3<br />
See W Kendrick The secret museum: Pornography in modern culture (1987); L<br />
Hunt (ed) Eroticism and the body politic (1991).<br />
41