20.06.2014 Views

Fashion Marketing: Contemporary Issues, Second edition - Pr School

Fashion Marketing: Contemporary Issues, Second edition - Pr School

Fashion Marketing: Contemporary Issues, Second edition - Pr School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

114 <strong>Fashion</strong> <strong>Marketing</strong><br />

traditional consumer goods groceries, clothes, shoes, furniture and white electrical<br />

goods. Even in the innovative electrical leisure sector, falling prices have<br />

offset increased sales volumes. Partly, this is the result of saturated markets.<br />

An ageing population consumes less calories per head and has acquired a<br />

stock of durable items, leaving only a replacement market. Most households<br />

have so much ‘stuff’ that they no longer know what to use or where to store<br />

it. Hence the growth in charity shops and car boot sales. In the United States,<br />

a growth industry is personal ‘lockups’ where surplus items can be stored and<br />

brought out on a rotating basis. Partly it is because of the improved quality<br />

and life expectancy of many products, especially motor vehicles and clothing,<br />

which need replacing less frequently, and partly it is because of changing<br />

personal attitudes to possessions which are no longer deemed by many to be<br />

an indicator of personal success and status. As the American retail commentator<br />

Carol Farmer (1995) wrote 10 years ago, ‘we have entered the Less<br />

Decade’.<br />

However, retailers, and retail marketers in particular, must also accept much<br />

of the blame for the performance of their sector. They have been guilty of the<br />

very mistake often attributed to Henry Ford offering customers any colour<br />

they want as long as it is black. In the drive for centralized control, economies<br />

of scale and low operating costs, they have, with a few notable exceptions:<br />

Reduced the choice available to shoppers, both in terms of available products<br />

(too often identical in different stores) and shopping locations, leading<br />

to accusations of identikit shopping experiences.<br />

Confused the customer with proliferation of similar products or products<br />

inappropriate to her needs.<br />

Irritated customers by de-listing favoured products on the basis of new systemized<br />

management techniques like DPP (Direct <strong>Pr</strong>oduct <strong>Pr</strong>ofitability).<br />

Wasted the customer’s time by locating key product categories in remote<br />

parts of the store, continuously changing the layout and product presentation,<br />

and slow payment processes.<br />

Explained away ‘no-service’ as ‘self-service’, and failed to invest in the calibre<br />

and training of store level staff who are in direct contact with customers.<br />

Created cloned stores and bland shopping centres which are virtually indistinguishable<br />

from each other.<br />

Offered products for sale that are consistently priced more highly<br />

than in other national markets (local cost structures and tax regimes<br />

notwithstanding).<br />

As Burns et al. (1997) pointed out in a telling article, ‘retail renewal’ has<br />

become the critical issue of the decade. It is an indictment of the past performance<br />

of retail marketers, supposedly the customer’s champion, that it is only<br />

now that some enlightened top managements have decided to truly focus<br />

on their customers that these issues have begun to be addressed. What these<br />

companies are doing will form the subject of the next section of this chapter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!