30.06.2014 Views

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

182 Stirling<br />

efficiency of the reaction. Although it is theoretically possible to amplify from a single<br />

copy of a sequence, if the reaction conditions are not optimized, such amplification<br />

may not reach a threshold for detection within the average 30-cycle PCR. If the object<br />

of the exercise is to determine the presence or absence of a specific sequence, elements<br />

of quantitation must be built into the reaction design to determine the required level of<br />

sensitivity. Where PCR is to be used to test for the presence of a pathogen for instance,<br />

consideration has to be given to the clinically significant levels. If a single organism<br />

is clinically significant, then clearly the test has to be capable of detecting a single<br />

copy. If, however, 1000 organisms are required for clinically significant event, the<br />

assay need not be as sensitive (1).<br />

2.2. Mixed Template Competition<br />

If the template contains more than one species of DNA capable of being amplified by<br />

the primers, those templates that exist in greater initial concentrations or that amplify<br />

more efficiently may outcompete the remaining templates. For instance, PCR is used to<br />

amplify papilloma virus sequences in cervical cytology specimens. Consensus primers<br />

are used to amplify a broad spectrum of viral strains, which can then be characterized<br />

by restriction digest or probe hybridization. If the patient has a mixed infection, it<br />

is likely that the more abundant strain will be amplified preferentially, resulting in<br />

only one strain being represented in the PCR product (2). This is perfectly adequate to<br />

determine which are the predominant strain(s) within a sample. However, if a complete<br />

description of the strains present is required, PCR should be performed to specifically<br />

amplify individual strains<br />

3. Quantitative PCR: General Considerations<br />

3.1. End-Point Analysis<br />

Unfortunately, the cause of quantitative PCR has not promoted by the use of end-point<br />

analysis. This approach simply amplifies multiple templates under the same set of conditions<br />

and examines the amount of product at the end of the run. Because PCR exhibits a<br />

typical exponential amplification of product, complete with lag phase and plateau, it is<br />

easily possible for widely differing starting template concentrations to yield remarkably<br />

similar final product concentrations. This can be a useful technique but only if great<br />

care is taken to establish an appropriate end point. Reactions should be sampled after<br />

a wide range of cycle numbers, to delineate the exponential phase, and the subsequent<br />

plateau. Tests should then be designed to sample during the exponential phase of<br />

amplification, before primers, dNTPs, and or enzyme become limiting. As with all<br />

quantifications, it is greatly enhanced by the inclusion of a suitable internal control.<br />

3.2. Limiting Dilution<br />

PCR quantitation can be achieved using qualitative end points. For the PCR to<br />

proceed, there must me a theoretical minimum of one template per reaction. Thus,<br />

if a dilution series is performed on the template, a dilution can be reached where an<br />

aliquot of sample taken for PCR has a statistical probability of containing no template<br />

molecules. The higher the initial template concentration, the greater the dilution<br />

required needed to reach that point. This approach has been used with great success<br />

to quantify viral titers (3).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!