30.06.2014 Views

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

410 Speel, Ramaekers, and Hopman<br />

polymerase (31,32). In principle, the number of in situ DNA targets to be detected<br />

simultaneously can be extended further by increasing the number of subsequent PRINS<br />

reactions applying different reporters/fluorochromes or combinations of two or more<br />

reporters in different ratios. However, the efficiency of this procedure is expected to<br />

decrease after multiple sequential PRINS reactions and, therefore, ISH is the preferred<br />

technique to use for the localization of more than 3 targets (Table 2 and refs. 34,35).<br />

PRINS has also been successfully combined with the immunocytochemical detection<br />

of proteins in multicolor approaches to, for example, immunophenotype cells harboring<br />

a specific chromosomal aberration or viral infection, to investigate chromosome<br />

distribution and segregation in cells during processes such as polyploidization and<br />

aneuploidization, and to identify possible relationships of different families of DNA<br />

sequences with, for example, proteins associated with different chromosome-specific<br />

structures, such as the kinetochore complex (see Chapter 63).<br />

Particularly, the rapidity, improved probe accessibility and lack of formamide for<br />

hybridization, thereby preventing the destruction of protein epitopes, are advantages of<br />

applying PRINS instead of ISH in these procedures.<br />

2.5. Improvement of the Detection Sensitivity<br />

The major drawback of PRINS for a long time proved to be its inability to convincingly<br />

detect single-copy gene sequences (27). This is caused by the fact that the in situ<br />

primer extension by Taq DNA polymerase in the biological material (adhered to glass<br />

slides) is limited to relatively short lengths (in the range of maximum a few hundreds<br />

of basepairs), probably caused by (1) the local chromatin organization of the target<br />

sequence; (2) the binding of (part of) the target to remnant proteins or the glass slide;<br />

and/or (3) the presence of nicks in the DNA where the polymerase reaction will stop<br />

(12). As a consequence, a single PRINS reaction to localize a single copy gene sequence<br />

with one primer (pair) will hardly result in a positive signal in the microscope, as<br />

the current detection sensitivity with ISH is approx 1 to 5 kb (2,36). The problem<br />

has now been overcome by using either multiple target-specific primers in a single<br />

PRINS reaction combined with reporter detection by the tyramide signal amplification<br />

procedure (28) or repeated PRINS reactions with the same reaction mixture and primers<br />

on specimen preparations (also called cycling PRINS) (8,20,29,37,38 and Chapter 60).<br />

Essential improvements of the first approach consisted of (1) the treatment of 1-d-old<br />

metaphase slides with 0.02 N HCl to remove loosely bound protein and thereby to<br />

render the DNA more accessible to the primer; (2) the use of multiple (four to five)<br />

primers for one locus; (3) one PRINS reaction and stringent washings in SSC to achieve<br />

optimal specificity; (4) the use of TaqStart, a monoclonal antibody against Taq DNA<br />

polymerase, which prevents nonspecific amplification and formation of primer-dimers;<br />

and (5) the use of biotin incorporation combined with biotin-labeled tyramide signal<br />

amplification (28). With this procedure a couple of single-copy genes have been<br />

detected in chromosome preparations with high efficiency (39). It will be interesting<br />

to see whether this approach can be applied to clinical cell and tissue specimens as<br />

well, for example, for rapid and reliable detection of microorganisms and chromosomal<br />

alterations in cancer specimens. Alternatively, cycling PRINS has been used on<br />

metaphase spreads and blood smears to detect low and single-copy DNA sequences<br />

resulting in more intense (up to 15×) fluorescence in situ signals than seen after a single

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!