30.06.2014 Views

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

376 Quivy and Becker<br />

that decreases the error rate during the amplification, and the use of an enzyme without<br />

the 3′-5′ exonuclease activity (e.g., Vent Exo) for efficient single primer extensions.<br />

The immobilization of the amplified fragments on paramagnetic beads exploiting the<br />

strong streptavidin/biotin interaction is crucial for the efficiency of the sequencing<br />

reaction because it allows the efficient removal of interfering primers from the PCR and<br />

permits the use of a single-strand template (4,5). The attachment of the sequenced DNA<br />

fragment to the solid support does not create a steric hindrance for the polymerase.<br />

Frequently, the sequence of the linker oligonucleotide itself can be determined at the<br />

very end of the genomic sequence (see Fig. 2B).<br />

The length of sequence determined critically depends on the ability to resolve long<br />

fragments with single nucleotide resolution, provided that the restriction site used for<br />

linker ligation is not too close to the known sequence. Fragments of over 800 bp have<br />

yielded reliable sequence <strong>info</strong>rmation (Fig. 2A). Longer sequences can be obtained<br />

in walking strategies where the newly determined sequence is in turn used to design<br />

further reaching sets of primers. The presented strategy critically relies on the previous<br />

identification of a suitable restriction site, ideally between 0.5 and 1 kb away from<br />

the known sequence. Too short fragments will yield little new sequence <strong>info</strong>rmation,<br />

whereas large fragments (exceeding 1 kb) do not work, presumably because of<br />

decreasing efficiencies in DNA denaturation and primer extensions reactions. Because<br />

any kind of restriction enzyme will work, a site can be conveniently identified on a<br />

Southern blot testing a small selection of enzymes that cut the genome at a reasonable<br />

frequency. Alternatively, a selection of enzymes can simply be tried at random in an<br />

LM-PCR sequencing reaction. To increase the chances that the reaction will work, the<br />

genomic DNA may be cleaved with a whole cocktail of enzymes that collectively have<br />

a high likelihood to produce a suitable restriction fragment.<br />

2. Materials<br />

2.1. Purification and Restriction of Genomic DNA<br />

1. Suspension of nuclei from desired organism (see Note 1).<br />

2. 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0.<br />

3. RNase A, DNase free, 10 mg/mL (Boehringer, Mannheim).<br />

4. Aqueous solution of N-lauroylsarkosine (sarkosyl), 20% (P/V) (Sigma).<br />

5. Proteinase K, 10 mg/mL (Merck).<br />

6. Phenol, highest quality, neutralized, and equilibrated with TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5;<br />

1 mM EDTA; Aurresco).<br />

7. Phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol mixture (25241; Aurresco).<br />

8. Chloroformisoamyl alcohol (241; Merck).<br />

9. 0.3 M sodium acetate, pH 5.2.<br />

10. Ethanol 100%.<br />

11. Ethanol 80%.<br />

12. TE: 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA.<br />

13. Restriction enzyme with suitable 10× reaction buffer (see Note 2).<br />

2.2. Primer Design, Primer Purification, and Annealing<br />

of the Linker Primer (see Note 3)<br />

The primers were synthesized on an ABI 394 DNA synthesizer and gel purified<br />

(see Subheading 3.2.).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!