30.06.2014 Views

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 McDonagh<br />

the dilution method is a semiquantitative system. Another consideration is that several<br />

reactions have to be run if Poisson distribution analysis is to be conducted using the<br />

limiting dilution method. Perhaps the most important consideration is that tube-to-tube<br />

variation is not controlled using this method (1).<br />

1.2. External Standard Curves<br />

This is based on the generation of an external standard curve where a dilution series<br />

of known amounts of template are carried out alongside each run.<br />

1.3. Coamplification of an Internal Reference Template<br />

The problem of tube-to-tube variation can be overcome by the coamplification of<br />

a single-copy cellular gene and the target sequence. This means that both templates<br />

should be affected by any variations of amplification efficiency. However, because<br />

different templates and reactions have different efficiencies, the relative amounts of<br />

product could vary. An added problem is that this system cannot be used to quantitate<br />

extracellular organisms and therefore is of no value in measuring viruses, including<br />

HIV and HCV, in plasma samples (1). As a result, this method will not be considered<br />

further.<br />

1.4. Competitive PCR Using an Internal Control<br />

The use of a competitive internal control that is similar to the target apart from<br />

length or the existence of a restriction site may alleviate the problems encountered with<br />

other methods of qPCR, such as co-amplification of an internal reference template (9).<br />

It will also act as a control for inhibition (10). Both the target and control DNA should<br />

amplify with the same efficiency because they compete equally under given conditions<br />

and the ratio of products will therefore remain constant throughout amplification (11).<br />

The point at which target and control DNA are equal can then be found by direct<br />

comparison using gel electrophoresis and densitometry or by enzyme immunoassay<br />

(EIA). This method has become the method of choice for quantitative assays, but it is<br />

expensive and time consuming because it requires several reactions per sample.<br />

To conduct a competitive PCR, it is necessary to create a template that is virtually<br />

the same as the product to be amplified but which can be identified during the detection<br />

stage. Primer-directed mutagenesis can be used to create a deletion, insert, or substitution<br />

at any point in the fragment (12,13). An outline of this procedure can be seen<br />

in Fig. 1. Two separate reactions are conducted, each using an external primer plus<br />

an internal primer containing the appropriate changes, for example, to create a novel<br />

restriction enzyme (RE) site. This can then be used as a competitive template, which<br />

can be differentiated from amplified wild-type product. The products of these reactions<br />

are purified, denatured, and renatured together then added to a PCR containing the<br />

outer primers. The resulting amplicon contains the mutated site and can be used directly<br />

or cloned to create as much template as required.<br />

The analysis of products is also important. Agarose gel electrophoresis, sometimes<br />

with densitometry, is easy to perform and is suitable for differentiating wild type from<br />

mutated products after digestion with the appropriate enzyme.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!