30.06.2014 Views

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 Stirling<br />

which will either not anneal, or if the annealing temperature is low enough, will anneal<br />

promiscuously, yielding multiple products. Simple aliquoting primers into manageable<br />

volumes will reduce both the scope for contamination and degradation. This practice<br />

should also be adopted for dNTP stocks for the same reason.<br />

4. Operator Errors<br />

Anyone involved in teaching molecular techniques hears the same complaint again<br />

and again: “These reaction volumes are too small! . . . I can’t see a microliter!” Even for<br />

those with many years of laboratory experience (perhaps especially for those), it can be<br />

difficult to adjust to dealing with small volume reactions. Although the obvious answer<br />

may be to increase the volume, this has both cost and efficiency implications.<br />

• Use appropriate pipetting devices. A pipettor designed for the 20- to 200-µL range will<br />

not accurately dispense 10 µL.<br />

• The use of master mixes not only reduces the dependence on accurately pipetting small<br />

volumes but also improves the control over reaction contents.<br />

• Practice with the same reaction until consistent results are obtained.<br />

5. PCR-Specific Difficulties<br />

Although much of the above could apply to any analytical laboratory technique,<br />

PCR also is subject to the confounding problem of contamination. Cross contamination<br />

of samples is of concern in any discipline, and good laboratory practice, such as<br />

careful pipetting and the constant changing of disposable pipet tips, will minimize<br />

the opportunity of this occurring. Where PCR differs from most other procedure is in<br />

the production of vast quantities of the analyte during the procedure. The presence of<br />

billions of copies of potential template can create severe problems. These problems can<br />

be minimized by physically separating the pre- and postamplification processes (ideally<br />

in different rooms with different pipettors, etc.); however, they should constantly be<br />

monitored by the inclusion of appropriate controls.<br />

6. Controls<br />

• No DNA. Although it can seem extravagant to constantly set up reactions without template,<br />

this is the best way to monitor for contamination. A separate “no DNA” control should<br />

be set up for each master mix or each individual reaction. If contamination is discovered,<br />

the pipettor should be decontaminated (as per manufacturers guidelines), and the reagent<br />

aliquot should be rechecked or discarded.<br />

• Positive control. PCR is often used simply to detect the presence of specific sequence. In<br />

such circumstances, it is essential to include at least one reaction with a template known<br />

to contain the sequence.<br />

• Internal control. Even when master mixes have been used to ensure consistency of reaction<br />

components, and a positive control is used, there is the possibility that template may be<br />

omitted from individual tubes. This can be addressed by the inclusion within each reaction<br />

tube of primers, which will amplify a target known to consistently be present in the test<br />

DNA (see factor IX in Chapter 47 for example).<br />

7. Regional Quality-Assurance Programs<br />

In addition to the in-house precautions detailed above, there are a growing number<br />

of specialist quality-assurance programs that have been developed for most diagnostic<br />

PCR.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!