30.06.2014 Views

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

qPCR to Detect RNA Viruses 197<br />

32<br />

Ultrasensitive Quantitative PCR to Detect RNA Viruses<br />

Susan McDonagh<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The use of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to detect RNA viruses<br />

has become increasingly important as a prognostic marker and in patient management,<br />

for example, in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)<br />

infection. Drug therapies can be monitored by regularly checking viral load, indicating<br />

whether the regime is sufficient, or whether alternatives should be sought. It is therefore<br />

crucial that the systems used are ultrasensitive and give accurate and reproducible<br />

results.<br />

There are several elements to consider in developing a reliable and accurate<br />

quantitative assay. First, rapid transport and storage of samples is important because<br />

of the unstable nature of RNA, as is the method of preparation. Samples should be<br />

received and processed within 6 h and the relevant fractions stored at –70°C until<br />

testing. Second, it is difficult to ascertain the efficiency of sample preparation methods;<br />

therefore, values obtained using qPCR may be several times lower than the actual copy<br />

number. Known standards should therefore be processed alongside samples to assess<br />

the loss within the system (1). Third, the efficiency of the reverse transcriptase step has<br />

been assessed to be from 5 (2) to 10% (3,4), and this must be taken into account when<br />

calculating viral load. Finally, there is a need to amplify all viral types equally, which<br />

can be a problem with the high mutation rate observed in RNA viruses. As a result,<br />

primers should be chosen from highly conserved noncoding regions. such as the 5′ noncoding<br />

region of HCV (5) and of enteroviruses (6).<br />

Several quantitative systems that use a variety of approaches have been developed<br />

and published. These include limiting dilution; the use of external standard curves;<br />

co-amplification of an internal reference template; and competitive PCR using an<br />

internal control. There are advantages and disadvantages with each of these systems,<br />

and the system of choice will depend on several factors. These methods have been used<br />

to detect as few as 40 copies of HCV (7), 64 and 4 copies of HIV per ml of plasma or<br />

serum, respectively (8,9), and less than 10 copies of enterovirus (10).<br />

1.1. Limiting Dilution<br />

The linear relationship between the amount of template and product is the basis of<br />

the limiting dilution method. However, this only occurs over a limited range; therefore,<br />

From: Methods in Molecular <strong>Bio</strong>logy, Vol. 226: PCR Protocols, Second Edition<br />

Edited by: J. M. S. <strong>Bartlett</strong> and D. Stirling © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!