30.06.2014 Views

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

John M. S. Bartlett.pdf - Bio-Nica.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RT In Situ PCR 445<br />

62<br />

Reverse Transcriptase In Situ PCR<br />

New Methods in Cellular Interrogation<br />

Mark Gilchrist and A. Dean Befus<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The advent of the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)<br />

technique represents a quantum leap in sensitivity over preceding methods of detecting<br />

mRNA transcripts, such as Northern blotting. With the arrival of such sensitive<br />

techniques, it has become possible to amplify RNA transcripts from very small amounts<br />

of template nucleic acid, thus opening new avenues of research that were previously<br />

off limits because of difficulties in obtaining adequate quantities and quality of RNA<br />

(1,2). However, RT-PCR suffers from the same limitations as its predecessor because<br />

the isolation of RNA necessitates the destruction of the cells/tissue involved, thus<br />

preventing the identification of the specific cell source of the mRNA (3). Conversely,<br />

in situ hybridization allows the specific localization of mRNA to the cells of origin,<br />

but the methodology is much less sensitive than RT-PCR (3). A methodology that<br />

combines the best attributes of in situ hybridization (specific cellular localization) and<br />

RT-PCR (high sensitivity) would be desirable. RT in situ PCR provides these attributes,<br />

allowing for the location and detection of low copy RNA species, amplified within<br />

individual intact cells (4).<br />

The method (Fig. 1) involves fixation of cells in suspension, followed by controlled<br />

digestion of the crosslinked cellular proteins with a proteolytic enzyme. This allows<br />

the entry of the RT and PCR reagents into the cell. Next, genomic DNA is removed<br />

by a DNase digestion step, thus ensuring that only mRNA is amplified. Subsequent<br />

steps of RT and PCR are then undertaken, using a “labeled” reporter nucleotide, which<br />

results in its direct incorporation into the PCR product. This is followed by a detection<br />

step that visualizes the amplified mRNA, either by chromogenic or radioactive means<br />

(Fig. 1). The specificity of the reaction can be then established by several methods<br />

(see Note 1).<br />

Methods of RT in situ PCR, although sharing fundamental steps, have varied greatly<br />

between laboratories (5–7). On the basis of our experience, RT in situ PCR seems to be<br />

best suited for the detection of mRNA in single-cell suspensions, in which fixation and<br />

pretreatments can be optimally controlled (8). The method outlined below is similar to<br />

that developed by Nuovo et al. 4,5) and has been adopted and built upon through our<br />

From: Methods in Molecular <strong>Bio</strong>logy, Vol. 226: PCR Protocols, Second Edition<br />

Edited by: J. M. S. <strong>Bartlett</strong> and D. Stirling © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ<br />

445

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!