Boxoffice-October.01.1955
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
^i^e ofi/ie 7/M(c^n f/'c/wie /m/wi/?//<br />
HE NATIONAL FILM WEEKLY<br />
Publilheij in Ninr Sfctionll Edilioni<br />
BEN<br />
SHLYEN<br />
"dilor-in-Chief and Publisher<br />
10 M. MERSEREAU Associate<br />
Publisher & Generol Monoge'<br />
,ES M. JERAULD EditoiTHAN<br />
COHEN. Executive Editor<br />
iE SHLYEN Monoging Editor<br />
FRAZE Field Editor<br />
AN SPEAR Western Editor<br />
L. THATCHER Equipment Editor<br />
IS SCHLOZM AN . Business Mgr<br />
Published Every Soturdov bv<br />
ASSOCIATED PUBLICATIONS<br />
ion Odices: S3S Van Brunt Blid<br />
Olr S-l. Mo N.ilhan fohen. Execu-<br />
Wttor: Jt^se Shiyen. Manelnj! Edl-<br />
Morrb Schloiman. Rii«lness Manaeer<br />
Tnxt. Fldd Filler: I. L. Thatcher.<br />
Th« Modfm Theatre Sectloo Telfrnestnut<br />
TTTT.<br />
Orticts: 49 RMkerellrr Plata. Nea<br />
J<br />
ft !0. N T Oonald M. MerserMu.<br />
mrtate ruhlUher t Ofneral Manaeer<br />
on W Jerauld. Editor: Ijirry Goodman<br />
Itor Promnilon-Shontn.mdlier Sfflinn<br />
J Sloeker. EqiilpmenI Adrerllslng<br />
ef>hone CONtmhii^ 5-6370.<br />
itr»l Ollrces: Editorial—920 No MIchI<br />
1 Aie. rhirico 11. III.. Frances B<br />
«- Telephone Sl'perlor 7-.'?972. .Adver-<br />
5 BasI Wacker Drlie. Chicago 1<br />
vine Hutchison and E. E. Yeck<br />
.*Ndoter 33042.<br />
OfficM: Editorial and Film .Adier-<br />
04 Hollywood Bird,. Ilnllywood<br />
Cillf Iran Spear, manager. Telenoilrtnod<br />
5-I18H<br />
film Adierllsing—fi72<br />
F>iulpment and<br />
S Ijifayette<br />
I* Place. I/is .\ngeles. C.ilir. Bob Well<br />
,to.<br />
manager. Telephone DCnklrk 8-22Sfi<br />
ihlton OKiee: .\1 Hnldsmlih, 1365<br />
lloiul Press BIdg. Phone Metropolltir<br />
mn. Sara Young. 415 Third St . N.W<br />
0(fic«: .Anthony finmer. 41 Ward-<br />
Telephone nETtard 5720/8282<br />
f MODRBN TIIEATnE Section Is In<br />
M Id the first l«ue of each month<br />
Ma: Paul Jones. The Constitution.<br />
aj: J. 8 Conners. 21-23 Walter .Are<br />
Uaore: George Browning, Stanley Thea<br />
biham: Eildle Badger. The Nevs<br />
itai: Frances Harding. 2-!'305<br />
I,lb<br />
1U«: Charle-s Taylor. 421 Pearl St<br />
irhttc Annie Mae Wllllamv EI) 2-1254<br />
itl: Lillian l^ianiii. 1746 Carrahen<br />
Elsie Loeb. Falrmount 1-0046<br />
Fred Oestrelcher. 646 Ithoades<br />
fktt.<br />
hi: Frank Bridler. 2n08A Jackson Bt<br />
Of. B. J Rose. 1645 LaFayette 81<br />
Holno: Run Schoch. Register-Tribune<br />
l»»: H. F Beies. Foi Theatre BIdg<br />
Corbin ralrlck. The Star<br />
Tlobert Com«ell. 323 E Bay<br />
111! Adams. 707 Spring 8t<br />
Ktlly nar»ood. 6R nibljcus<br />
S<br />
»ioket: Wm. NIchol. 636 N 14th St<br />
rwiPolU: l,es Bees. 2123 Fremont Sq<br />
Haiefi Walter fludar. The Register<br />
Orleans L. n«yer. 8818 Prilchard PI<br />
thona City Poll; Trindle. 1315 Broad-<br />
«» Place<br />
*»: Irrlng Baker. 911 N 51st 81<br />
adelphia: Norman Shlgon. 5363 Berk<br />
*wih: R. F Kllngensmlth. 518 Jeanetle.<br />
WIIMnsburg. Churchill 1-2809<br />
:l«lld. Ore.: Arnold Marks. Jnum»l<br />
Looh: Pate Barrett. 5149 Rosa<br />
Uke City: II Pearson. Tleseret Neus<br />
Antonio: I,. Ketncr. CA 3-7266<br />
Fnneism- Gall Mpman. 2R7-2Sth<br />
"..Skyline 1-4355: Advertising: Jerrt<br />
••ell. noward BIdg. Yr 6 2522<br />
tie: Pate B.illard. 1303 Campus Pk»v<br />
'tlhfton Sara Young. 20rh-Fox<br />
In<br />
Canada<br />
trtal: 300 Umoyne St.. Jul« L»ro<br />
llohn 116 Prince IMinrd. W. MeViilty<br />
Into: 1675 Rayilev Aie . Wlllowdale.<br />
Gladlsh<br />
l-oiner: l.yrlc Theatre BIdg . Jack Droy<br />
lilpeg 282 Rupertsland. Ben Sommers<br />
I<br />
taker Audit Bureau of Circulations<br />
r«l as Second Class matter at Post<br />
'. KaiMS City. Mo. Sectional F/lltlon<br />
|0 It" year: Nat1on.il Rdlllni 17 50<br />
: T B E R 1,<br />
67<br />
19 5 5<br />
No. 23<br />
A<br />
KEYS TO HARMONY<br />
rCREEMENT reached, at l.,r,g<br />
last, nil a voluntary arbitration plan for the inilustrv<br />
holds opportunity for the amicalde<br />
setlliiu.i ol riuiny of the industry's most pernicious<br />
internal pioLlenis. \X'ith the approval given the<br />
plan hy the exhibitor and distributor committees,<br />
who long have had it under consideration, the<br />
way has been cleared for the subsequent steps<br />
necessary to its implementation. These call for<br />
approval by at least four participating exhibitor<br />
organizations, the participating film distributing<br />
companies, the Department of Justice and the<br />
New York Federal District Court.<br />
Action on the plan is expected at the Theatre<br />
Owners of America convention at Los Angeles.<br />
If favorable, which indications are that it will<br />
be. the other important exhibitor groups are<br />
seen to follow the ajiproving action already taken<br />
by the Independent Theatre Owners of .New<br />
^ ork. Allied States AssTi is the only exception,<br />
refraining from participation, because its insistence<br />
that film rentals be included as an<br />
arbitrable subject had not been heeded. However,<br />
individual .Allied members and unaffiliated<br />
exhibitors may avail themselves of the use of<br />
arbitration, if they so desire.<br />
F"or the purpose of settling disputes as quickly<br />
as possible, a conciliation |)lan has been incorporated<br />
into the arbitration draft. It is hoped that<br />
through conciliation many exhibitor-distributor<br />
controversies can be settled without need even for<br />
arbitration, let alone having to go to court.<br />
This could very well prove a most important<br />
factor, tending, as it would, to bring the disputants—exhibitor<br />
and branch manager—together<br />
in an endeavor to reconcile their points of<br />
difference. It is conceivable that this might even<br />
work to effect the so-called local autonomy for<br />
branch heads, so often advocated by exhibitors.<br />
It would seem incumbent on both jjarties to a<br />
controversy to try to reach an understanding,<br />
if only to avoid the costs that would be incurred<br />
by resort to arbitration, small though they may<br />
be. The availability of arbitration, however,<br />
provides another avenue of approach to settlement<br />
of the problem at hand.<br />
U'hile film rentals, per se. are not included<br />
among the arbitrable or conciliating subjects,<br />
other points of controversy that have a direct<br />
bearing thereon are admissable. These include<br />
clearance, runs, competitive bidding and availability<br />
of prints. .MI of these, sejiarately or combined,<br />
affect the rental value of films. Making<br />
possible adjudication of differences arising over<br />
these buying and booking factors should go a<br />
long way toward reducing much of the exhibitor<br />
( iiiili'iilioii that liliii costs are disproportionate<br />
to performance records.<br />
The merits of arbitration haxe many limes<br />
been cited throughout the \ears that it has bei-n<br />
under cunsideratioii by this industry. There is<br />
widespread belief in its principle and it is<br />
being successfully applied by many industries;<br />
its institution by the film industry has been<br />
recommended by the judiciary and legislati\e<br />
branches of the government as well as by industry<br />
leaders. It needs but a chance to prove<br />
itself, which it can and will do, if it is not<br />
hampered by prejudice or unfair tactics.<br />
I Remembering the debacle that occurred in<br />
1912. resulting from disagreement over the<br />
financing and apportionment of the sharing of<br />
costs of the system then existent, it would be well<br />
to settle these points fully before the new system<br />
becomes operative. I<br />
No one expects arbitration to be a panacea<br />
a cure-all for the industry's ills. But it can be of<br />
help to ease, if not eliminate, many of them.<br />
[^roposed for a 12-months trial, the industry has<br />
iiothiii"' to lose, perhaps, much to gain by accepting<br />
it. if only on this basis, if it should fail<br />
in its intended purpose, it can be dropped.<br />
Meanwhile, exhibitors—who are the onlv ones<br />
who may file claims with the arbitration boards<br />
are not forced to do so; they are free to take<br />
their trade disputes to court, if they so desire.<br />
It may, however, be pointed out that court procedure<br />
is a long, drawn-out, costly method. Conciliation,<br />
where the problem is not too complex,<br />
and arbitration, if required, are the easier.<br />
quicker and far less costly keys to harmonious<br />
trade relations.<br />
Right You Are, Jack!<br />
John Ford, who with Mervyn LeRoy shared<br />
the credit for directing "Mister Roberts," Avhich<br />
received the <strong>Boxoffice</strong> Blue Ribbon .Award for<br />
July, sent us the following acknowledgement:<br />
"There are awards and awards, but the<br />
BoxOFFiCF. Award is certainly treasured by me<br />
because it is what it says—<strong>Boxoffice</strong>. After all.<br />
we are in the business and we want to keep it<br />
going. / have found thai a good, clean American<br />
picture that can shou' a little profit is the hr^t<br />
means for keeping this great business aliv<br />
\£c^^ /OOvUyt^'i^