The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WOMEN’S FRIENDSHIPS AND LESBIANISM<br />
intellectually inferior which should be enough to discourage<br />
women from ‘imitation’. Bloch informs us that ‘original’<br />
homosexuality is much less common amongst women than<br />
amongst men, ‘Whereas in many women even at a<br />
comparatively advanced age, the so-called “pseudohomosexuality”<br />
is much more frequently met with than it is in<br />
men.’ 15 This pious hope that women are somehow more innately<br />
heterosexual than men, he supports with the explanation that<br />
heterosexual women are inclined towards ‘tenderness <strong>and</strong><br />
caresses’ which make it easy for ‘pseudohomosexual tendencies’<br />
to arise. 16<br />
For Bloch, as for the other sexologists, male homosexuality<br />
was defined by genital contact <strong>and</strong> their lack of other kinds of<br />
physical contact with each other prevented men from straying<br />
from the heterosexual path. Through the defining of any physical<br />
caresses between women as ‘pseudohomosexuality’ by the<br />
sexologists, the isolation <strong>and</strong> stigmatising of lesbianism was<br />
accomplished, <strong>and</strong> women’s friendships were impoverished by<br />
the suspicion cast upon any physical expression of emotion.<br />
What lesbians do in bed<br />
In order to fit women’s passionate friendships into the category<br />
of lesbianism, it was necessary to categorise the forms of physical<br />
expression quite usual in these relationships as homosexual<br />
behaviour. So Ellis asserted that the commonest form of sex<br />
practice between women was ‘kissing <strong>and</strong> embracing’ <strong>and</strong> that<br />
genital contact was rare:<br />
Homosexual passion in women finds more or less complete<br />
expression in kissing, sleeping together, <strong>and</strong> close embraces,<br />
as in what is sometimes called ‘lying spoons’…mutual contact<br />
<strong>and</strong> friction of the sexual parts seems to be comparatively<br />
rare…. While the use of the clitoris is rare in homosexuality,<br />
the use of an artificial penis is by no means uncommon <strong>and</strong><br />
very widespread. 17<br />
We notice that whilst describing the rarity of genital contact<br />
Ellis found it necessary to cite the use of the ‘dildo’. <strong>The</strong> use of<br />
dildos is likely to have been as rare between women in the<br />
nineteenth century as it is in lesbian practice today. <strong>The</strong> use of<br />
dildos has always been a common motif of men’s sexual fantasies<br />
about lesbians <strong>and</strong> figures largely in nineteenth-century male<br />
pornography, as it does today. It is probably from this source<br />
that Ellis derives his inspiration. It is possible that some of his<br />
109