The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WOMEN’S FRIENDSHIPS AND LESBIANISM<br />
redefine or reject when they adopted the ideology of the male<br />
sexologists.<br />
Browne’s paper ‘<strong>The</strong> Sexual Variety <strong>and</strong> Variability among<br />
Women’ is described by Sheila Rowbotham as having a ‘very<br />
modern relevance in what she says about love <strong>and</strong> women’s sexual<br />
feelings’. 32 <strong>Her</strong> discussion of lesbianism is described as ‘dated’<br />
<strong>and</strong> much to be expected in its ‘specific historical context’. In fact<br />
the promotion of heterosex to women in which Browne was<br />
involved required the denigration of lesbianism. <strong>The</strong> two cannot<br />
be separated <strong>and</strong> both emerged from a ‘specific historical context’.<br />
<strong>The</strong>n, as now, the construction of compulsory heterosexuality<br />
for women has been based upon the stigmatising of lesbianism.<br />
Browne distinguished between pseudohomosexuality <strong>and</strong> real<br />
lesbianism: ‘Artificial or substitute homosexuality—as distinct<br />
from true inversion—is very widely diffused among women, as a<br />
result of the repression of normal gratification <strong>and</strong> the segregation<br />
of the sexes, which still largely obtains.’ 33 She further distinguished<br />
between pseudohomosexuality, which she went so far as to say<br />
might be ‘entirely platonic’, <strong>and</strong> ‘true affectionate friendship’<br />
between women: ‘Sometimes its only direct manifestations are<br />
quite noncommittal <strong>and</strong> platonic but even this incomplete <strong>and</strong><br />
timid homosexuality can always be distinguished from true<br />
affectionate friendship between women, by its jealous, exacting<br />
<strong>and</strong> extravagant tone.’ 34 Browne gives women a clue about how<br />
to classify the nature of their feelings for other women. Homosexual<br />
love is ‘jealous, exacting <strong>and</strong> extravagant’, i.e. unpleasant. She<br />
offers no clearer distinction <strong>and</strong> it would not be surprising if<br />
women remained confused. <strong>The</strong> dividing line between friendship<br />
<strong>and</strong> pseudohomosexuality is clearly artificial given that<br />
pseudohomosexuality can be ‘platonic’ anyway. She compounds<br />
the confusion by saying that women need not doubt their<br />
heterosexuality even if they experience no attraction towards<br />
men until late in life <strong>and</strong> have felt devotion <strong>and</strong> intense desire for<br />
women friends:<br />
Also many women of quite normally directed [heterosexual]<br />
inclinations, realise in mature life, when they have<br />
experienced passion, that the devoted admiration <strong>and</strong><br />
friendship they felt for certain girl friends, had a real, though<br />
perfectly unconscious, spark of desire in its exaltation <strong>and</strong><br />
intensity; an unmistakable, indefinable note, which was<br />
absolutely lacking in many equally sincere <strong>and</strong> lasting<br />
friendships. 35<br />
116