25.10.2014 Views

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DECLINE OF MILITANT FEMINISM<br />

reproduction, but on the contrary they reduced sex simply to<br />

one specifically reproductive practice.<br />

In the 1920s feminists had not entirely ab<strong>and</strong>oned<br />

campaigning around those issues in the field of sexuality which<br />

had exercised pre-war feminists, although the impetus was much<br />

blunted. In the area of prostitution the feminists campaigned to<br />

achieve an equitable law regarding women <strong>and</strong> men gained a<br />

pyrrhic victory. Feminists working within organisations like<br />

the Association for Moral <strong>and</strong> Social Hygiene wanted to make<br />

it illegal for either men or women wilfully to cause annoyance<br />

to any person in the street. <strong>The</strong>y wanted it to be necessary for<br />

the person annoyed to appear in court so that no one might be<br />

prosecuted simply on the word of a policeman. <strong>The</strong>se provisions<br />

were introduced into Parliament in a Bill entitled <strong>The</strong> Public<br />

Places Order Bill’ in 1925. <strong>The</strong> Bill failed, but feminists do<br />

seem to have been having some effect through the pressure of<br />

their opinion on police <strong>and</strong> magistrates. An article in the<br />

Woman’s Leader in 1925 explained that the figures for arrests<br />

of prostitutes in London had fallen from 2,504 in 1921 to 538<br />

in 1923. 34 <strong>The</strong> article suggested that this change came about<br />

because ‘magistrates stiffened by the opinion of the public <strong>and</strong><br />

the press are reluctant to convict a woman on the sole word of<br />

a policeman, <strong>and</strong> the police either cannot or do not produce an<br />

independent witness.’<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1928 McMillan Report on Prostitution recommended<br />

precisely the kind of law on annoyance in the streets that the<br />

feminists wanted. This should have been a crowning success<br />

but the recommendations were never implemented. In 1959 the<br />

solicitation laws against women were made even more severe<br />

<strong>and</strong> in 1960 the Association for Moral <strong>and</strong> Social Hygiene<br />

admitted defeat after nearly a century of struggle for the civil<br />

rights of prostitutes. <strong>The</strong>y concluded: ‘<strong>The</strong> law makes the<br />

prostitute the scapegoat for the sins of society…in these matters<br />

the man enjoys a favoured position due to a false position <strong>and</strong><br />

our comfortable acceptance of a double moral st<strong>and</strong>ard.’ 35 <strong>The</strong><br />

feminist campaigners had recognised very clearly that the basic<br />

idea on which prostitution was justfied <strong>and</strong> considered to be<br />

necessary, was that of the man’s uncontrollable sex drive. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

sought to point out that men were not injured by occasional<br />

continence. With the idea that continence was harmful the<br />

sexologists undermined the gathering strength of the feminist<br />

assault on the abuse of women in prostitution.<br />

One campaign in which feminists were successful was that<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!