The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
‘THE SORT OF THING THAT MIGHT HAPPEN TO ANY MAN’<br />
National Union of Societies for Equal Citizenship which<br />
developed out of the prewar National Union of Women’s Suffrage<br />
Societies. Sexual abuse was also a prominant issue in the<br />
Woman’s Leader, the NUSEC journal, in the context of the<br />
many equal rights issues around which feminists were fighting.<br />
Around such aspects of the campaign against sexual abuse as<br />
the male bias of police <strong>and</strong> courts, the attitudes of professed<br />
feminists, women’s organisations <strong>and</strong> women representatives<br />
of church <strong>and</strong> social purity organisations were in close harmony.<br />
All saw the justice system as biased against women <strong>and</strong> saw<br />
themselves as fighting for the interests of women <strong>and</strong> girl children<br />
as a group. Such a situation does not exist today, when we are<br />
used to non-feminist women campaigners around sexuality in<br />
groups such as the National Viewers <strong>and</strong> Listeners Association<br />
<strong>and</strong> church organisations being overtly anti-feminist <strong>and</strong> hostile<br />
to the idea that there might be a contradiction between the<br />
interests of women <strong>and</strong> the interests of men.<br />
Votes for Women carried a regular feature throughout 1915<br />
entitled ‘Comparison of Punishments’. This was designed to<br />
highlight the huge disparity between sentences which were being<br />
given by the courts for crimes against women <strong>and</strong> those given<br />
for minor offences against property or for offences against boys.<br />
In the feature one column would carry three examples of light<br />
punishments <strong>and</strong> the other column would carry three examples<br />
of heavy punishments. Under light punishments there would be<br />
an example of wife abuse, an example of the sexual abuse of<br />
female children <strong>and</strong> one of cruelty to animals. <strong>The</strong> ‘heavy’<br />
column contained examples of petty theft <strong>and</strong> vagrancy or the<br />
sexual abuse of boys. On 1 January the examples of light<br />
punishments were: a young man of 19 charged with indecent<br />
assault on girls of 8 <strong>and</strong> 9 received 3 months hard labour, a<br />
man charged with cruelty to a horse received a £4 fine, a<br />
labourer living apart from his wife who molested her in the<br />
street <strong>and</strong> threw stones at her window received 2 months hard<br />
labour. <strong>The</strong> examples of heavy punishments for comparison<br />
were as follows: a 64-year-old pastor of Hackney Mission Hall<br />
was charged with assaulting a boy in a picture palace <strong>and</strong><br />
received 5 years penal servitude, a coster who stole 4 coats<br />
received 12 months hard labour, <strong>and</strong> a man found guilty of<br />
fraud on shopkeepers for sums amounting to under £5 received<br />
two sentences of 18 <strong>and</strong> 15 months imprisonment. Each feature<br />
carried a comment section <strong>and</strong> on this occasion it asked why<br />
the distinction was made between boys <strong>and</strong> girls. <strong>The</strong> writer<br />
58