The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FEMINISM AND SOCIAL PURITY<br />
Not simply because women are the weaker sex; in all but<br />
the strictly physical sense this is becoming more <strong>and</strong> more<br />
untrue; but (1) because of the great dignity of the position of<br />
wife <strong>and</strong> mother to which every woman may be called, <strong>and</strong><br />
(2) because in marriage or otherwise woman has a soul of<br />
her own <strong>and</strong> a spiritual destiny of her own to work out. She<br />
is not to be the servant of man’s convenience or pleasure,<br />
either in marriage or apart from it…woman is not to be<br />
patronised; she is different, not inferior. 19<br />
She asserts the Christian virtues of wifehood <strong>and</strong> motherhood<br />
<strong>and</strong> that women have different roles, yet at the same time her<br />
sentiments about woman’s relationship to man are strongly<br />
feminist. Hopkins’s writing recognised that there was a<br />
confrontation between the interests of men <strong>and</strong> women. In the<br />
sexual system she described, women were the objects of men’s<br />
exploitation <strong>and</strong> men the aggressors. This was a very different<br />
message from that which emerges from our contemporary<br />
equivalents to social purity. <strong>The</strong> writings of Mary Whitehouse,<br />
for instance, attack the sexual behaviour of ‘people’ rather than<br />
men, <strong>and</strong> Whitehouse makes no personal identification with<br />
women <strong>and</strong> what is happening to them. Hopkins’s condemnation<br />
of men for the abuse of women <strong>and</strong> her anger at them, are<br />
unequivocal in the following statement from her social purity<br />
pamphlet <strong>The</strong> Ride of Death. Hopkins described prostitutes<br />
who had ‘lost their way’ <strong>and</strong> were close to ‘disease, degradation<br />
curses, drink, despair’. She asked:<br />
For who has driven them into that position? Men; men who<br />
ought to have protected them, instead of degrading them;<br />
men who have taken advantage of a woman’s weakness to<br />
gratify their own selfish pleasure, not seeing that a woman’s<br />
weakness was given to call out a man’s strength. Ay, I know<br />
that it is often the woman who tempts; these poor creatures<br />
must tempt or starve. But that does not touch the broad issue,<br />
that it is men who endow the degradation of women; it is<br />
men who, making the dem<strong>and</strong>, create the supply. Stop the<br />
money of men <strong>and</strong> the whole thing would be starved out in<br />
three months’ time. 20<br />
Hopkins saw men’s dem<strong>and</strong>s as the underlying cause of<br />
prostitution. She recognised that poverty <strong>and</strong> the limited<br />
opportunities allowed to women for making a decent living,<br />
were the reasons many women entered prostitution <strong>and</strong> she<br />
14