25.10.2014 Views

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FEMINISM AND SOCIAL PURITY<br />

Not simply because women are the weaker sex; in all but<br />

the strictly physical sense this is becoming more <strong>and</strong> more<br />

untrue; but (1) because of the great dignity of the position of<br />

wife <strong>and</strong> mother to which every woman may be called, <strong>and</strong><br />

(2) because in marriage or otherwise woman has a soul of<br />

her own <strong>and</strong> a spiritual destiny of her own to work out. She<br />

is not to be the servant of man’s convenience or pleasure,<br />

either in marriage or apart from it…woman is not to be<br />

patronised; she is different, not inferior. 19<br />

She asserts the Christian virtues of wifehood <strong>and</strong> motherhood<br />

<strong>and</strong> that women have different roles, yet at the same time her<br />

sentiments about woman’s relationship to man are strongly<br />

feminist. Hopkins’s writing recognised that there was a<br />

confrontation between the interests of men <strong>and</strong> women. In the<br />

sexual system she described, women were the objects of men’s<br />

exploitation <strong>and</strong> men the aggressors. This was a very different<br />

message from that which emerges from our contemporary<br />

equivalents to social purity. <strong>The</strong> writings of Mary Whitehouse,<br />

for instance, attack the sexual behaviour of ‘people’ rather than<br />

men, <strong>and</strong> Whitehouse makes no personal identification with<br />

women <strong>and</strong> what is happening to them. Hopkins’s condemnation<br />

of men for the abuse of women <strong>and</strong> her anger at them, are<br />

unequivocal in the following statement from her social purity<br />

pamphlet <strong>The</strong> Ride of Death. Hopkins described prostitutes<br />

who had ‘lost their way’ <strong>and</strong> were close to ‘disease, degradation<br />

curses, drink, despair’. She asked:<br />

For who has driven them into that position? Men; men who<br />

ought to have protected them, instead of degrading them;<br />

men who have taken advantage of a woman’s weakness to<br />

gratify their own selfish pleasure, not seeing that a woman’s<br />

weakness was given to call out a man’s strength. Ay, I know<br />

that it is often the woman who tempts; these poor creatures<br />

must tempt or starve. But that does not touch the broad issue,<br />

that it is men who endow the degradation of women; it is<br />

men who, making the dem<strong>and</strong>, create the supply. Stop the<br />

money of men <strong>and</strong> the whole thing would be starved out in<br />

three months’ time. 20<br />

Hopkins saw men’s dem<strong>and</strong>s as the underlying cause of<br />

prostitution. She recognised that poverty <strong>and</strong> the limited<br />

opportunities allowed to women for making a decent living,<br />

were the reasons many women entered prostitution <strong>and</strong> she<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!