The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
‘THE SORT OF THING THAT MIGHT HAPPEN TO ANY MAN’<br />
states that the distinction could not be made on the grounds of<br />
the damage caused since young girls could be made pregnant<br />
<strong>and</strong> boys could not:<br />
Is a boy so much more valuable than a girl? Is the girl so<br />
much less rigorously protected? Or is the wickedness of the<br />
crime judged on some scale which does not consider the<br />
harm inflicted? And if so, why should the fixing of that scale<br />
lie exclusively with men? 14<br />
<strong>The</strong> comment attached to another ‘Comparison of Punishments’<br />
feature was entitled ‘New Danger to Young Girls’. <strong>The</strong> ‘new<br />
danger’ was the wave of patriotism in the First World War<br />
which, in its admiration for the men who were defending their<br />
country, promoted the idea that a soldier could do no wrong.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re was a ‘tendency on the part of some magistrates <strong>and</strong><br />
some newspapers to take a lenient view of criminal <strong>and</strong> other<br />
assaults on women <strong>and</strong> girls, when these are committed by<br />
men in uniform, or by men willing to enlist.’ 15 <strong>The</strong> magistrate’s<br />
remark in the case of a soldier who had attacked four women is<br />
quoted, ‘You look like a decent young fellow, <strong>and</strong> you are in<br />
uniform. If it were not for that you would go to prison.’ 16 <strong>The</strong><br />
soldier was given a 40 shilling fine.<br />
<strong>The</strong> writer of the feature did not simply want heavier sentences<br />
for all offences. She wanted a reversal of the pattern of sentencing<br />
so that offences against the person would always be treated<br />
more seriously than offences against property. It is clear from.<br />
this feature that feminists were not seeing sexual abuse in a<br />
vacuum, as a uniquely horrifying offence. <strong>The</strong>y saw it as one<br />
of a series of crimes against women which included wifebattering,<br />
which were not taken seriously by the male justice<br />
system. <strong>The</strong> title of one comment section, which addressed itself<br />
entirely to assault on female children, makes this clear. It is<br />
called ‘Crimes against Women’. 17 A feminist interpretation from<br />
the Vote about why wife-battering was not taken seriously by<br />
the courts shows that the feminists were not just taking a punitive<br />
law <strong>and</strong> order line. <strong>The</strong>ir concern was with the way in which<br />
women were treated as second-class citizens. This writer uses<br />
an analogy between race <strong>and</strong> class oppression to make her<br />
point:<br />
A man recently tried to excuse the conduct of certain white<br />
men when dealing with coloured races. He said that an<br />
unconquerable <strong>and</strong> inexplicable aversion arising from the<br />
59