25.10.2014 Views

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

‘THE SORT OF THING THAT MIGHT HAPPEN TO ANY MAN’<br />

states that the distinction could not be made on the grounds of<br />

the damage caused since young girls could be made pregnant<br />

<strong>and</strong> boys could not:<br />

Is a boy so much more valuable than a girl? Is the girl so<br />

much less rigorously protected? Or is the wickedness of the<br />

crime judged on some scale which does not consider the<br />

harm inflicted? And if so, why should the fixing of that scale<br />

lie exclusively with men? 14<br />

<strong>The</strong> comment attached to another ‘Comparison of Punishments’<br />

feature was entitled ‘New Danger to Young Girls’. <strong>The</strong> ‘new<br />

danger’ was the wave of patriotism in the First World War<br />

which, in its admiration for the men who were defending their<br />

country, promoted the idea that a soldier could do no wrong.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re was a ‘tendency on the part of some magistrates <strong>and</strong><br />

some newspapers to take a lenient view of criminal <strong>and</strong> other<br />

assaults on women <strong>and</strong> girls, when these are committed by<br />

men in uniform, or by men willing to enlist.’ 15 <strong>The</strong> magistrate’s<br />

remark in the case of a soldier who had attacked four women is<br />

quoted, ‘You look like a decent young fellow, <strong>and</strong> you are in<br />

uniform. If it were not for that you would go to prison.’ 16 <strong>The</strong><br />

soldier was given a 40 shilling fine.<br />

<strong>The</strong> writer of the feature did not simply want heavier sentences<br />

for all offences. She wanted a reversal of the pattern of sentencing<br />

so that offences against the person would always be treated<br />

more seriously than offences against property. It is clear from.<br />

this feature that feminists were not seeing sexual abuse in a<br />

vacuum, as a uniquely horrifying offence. <strong>The</strong>y saw it as one<br />

of a series of crimes against women which included wifebattering,<br />

which were not taken seriously by the male justice<br />

system. <strong>The</strong> title of one comment section, which addressed itself<br />

entirely to assault on female children, makes this clear. It is<br />

called ‘Crimes against Women’. 17 A feminist interpretation from<br />

the Vote about why wife-battering was not taken seriously by<br />

the courts shows that the feminists were not just taking a punitive<br />

law <strong>and</strong> order line. <strong>The</strong>ir concern was with the way in which<br />

women were treated as second-class citizens. This writer uses<br />

an analogy between race <strong>and</strong> class oppression to make her<br />

point:<br />

A man recently tried to excuse the conduct of certain white<br />

men when dealing with coloured races. He said that an<br />

unconquerable <strong>and</strong> inexplicable aversion arising from the<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!