The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
‘THE SORT OF THING THAT MIGHT HAPPEN TO ANY MAN’<br />
deserved no consideration or protection. <strong>The</strong> campaigners around<br />
sexual abuse fought these attitudes, though they were sometimes<br />
unable to reject them without ambivalence because the dominant<br />
sexual ideology left its residues within them.<br />
<strong>The</strong> women campaigners argued fiercely against allegations,<br />
by magistrates <strong>and</strong> judges <strong>and</strong> in the press, that the abused<br />
children were seductive. Lady Astor in the House of Commons<br />
fulminated against a judge’s conclusion that a little girl of 7<br />
had encouraged the assault upon her. ‘Nobody can say that a<br />
little girl of 7, 8, 9 or 10 could lead a man on,’ she asserted. 29<br />
<strong>The</strong> Shield frequently carried expressions of indignation at this<br />
form of victim-blaming. As late as 1937 the editorial was still<br />
making the same point. Amidst anger that girls of under 16<br />
years were being described as a danger to men, <strong>and</strong> the fact<br />
that they could get three years’ detention in a home whilst the<br />
man was acquitted or bound over, it stated:<br />
We wish judges would not encourage people to think that<br />
decent men are morally defenceless creatures against the<br />
wiles of unscrupulous girls under 16, <strong>and</strong> that their seduction<br />
by the girl, even if they themselves are over 30, is mainly<br />
the girl’s iniquity. 30<br />
Votes for Women in 1915 in one of its ‘Comparison of<br />
Punishments’ features gave a strong feminist reaction to victimblaming.<br />
<strong>The</strong> writer roundly criticised the press for saying little<br />
girls are to blame: ‘the practice of putting the blame for these<br />
discreditable outrages upon the child or the young woman is an<br />
abominable one, <strong>and</strong> would not be tolerated in any country<br />
where women are regarded with honour <strong>and</strong> respect.’ 31<br />
<strong>The</strong> way the child victim was treated by the authorities<br />
depended upon the attitudes of clergy <strong>and</strong> social workers<br />
towards her. <strong>The</strong> women campaigners were engaged in a<br />
struggle to combat the view that the ‘fallen’ child was evil <strong>and</strong><br />
corrupting. Examples of this latter attitude came from<br />
representatives of the church at the 1914 Child Assault<br />
conference. <strong>The</strong> chairman, the Lord Bishop of Ely, gave a<br />
viewpoint which was significantly lacking in Christian charity:<br />
It [sexual abuse] is a crime degrading <strong>and</strong> terrible in itself<br />
<strong>and</strong> has the worst effect on the rising generation. <strong>The</strong>se poor<br />
children ought to be precluded from association with other<br />
children, for without any fault of their own they are moral<br />
lepers. 32<br />
64