The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FEMINISM AND SOCIAL PURITY<br />
League which shows her to have been as powerful a<br />
propag<strong>and</strong>ist as Butler or Hopkins. Ormiston Chant writes that<br />
she received a letter from a friend which stated that it was more<br />
dreadful for a woman to ‘fall into sin’ than for a man. Chant’s<br />
reply was a firm denial of this idea. She explained that women<br />
had been taught to accept that double st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>and</strong> that:<br />
Unchastity is necessary for men—that it is the masculine<br />
prerogative—that a certain class of women must be sacrificed<br />
to this necessity, <strong>and</strong> that no good woman does, or ought, to<br />
know, anything about it; <strong>and</strong> that such a thing as chastity in<br />
the bridegroom, who requires it as an absolute necessity in<br />
his bride, is really asking too much of the so-called stronger<br />
sex. 24<br />
After attacking the Contagious Diseases Acts as being designed<br />
to make unchastity safe for men, by medical inspection of<br />
prostitutes, she employed a dramatic example of role reversal<br />
to bring the iniquity of the double st<strong>and</strong>ard home to her readers:<br />
Think of good women <strong>and</strong> men, knowing that I was a rake<br />
(feminine), inviting me to their houses, winking at my<br />
loathesomeness, but making feeble attempts to shut my victim<br />
up in a refuge, <strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong>ing him as ‘fallen’! And think, oh<br />
think, of my blatantly talking of my brutality as necessity—<br />
of my requiring my husb<strong>and</strong> to believe it—a coward, a liar,<br />
<strong>and</strong> a perjuror, who vowed a marriage vow, <strong>and</strong> deliberately<br />
broke it. 25<br />
Jane Ellice Hopkins was very strongly involved in the campaign<br />
to prevent men’s abuse of girl children. She campaigned for the<br />
Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1885 which raised the age of<br />
consent for sexual intercourse to 16, with the aim of reducing<br />
the use of young girls in prostitution. She gave evidence before<br />
the 1881 House of Lords Commission on the protection of girls,<br />
stimulated petitioning up <strong>and</strong> down the country—particularly<br />
through the Ladies Associations for Friendless Girls, which were<br />
her inspiration—on the age of consent, <strong>and</strong> spent the two years<br />
prior to the passing of the Act in an exhausting national speaking<br />
tour on the subject. It was her concern with preventing the abuse<br />
of children which led her into an aspect of her work which was<br />
strongly criticised by feminists. She was worried that children<br />
who lived in brothels would take up the same career as their<br />
mothers. She supported the passing of the Industrial Schools<br />
Act of 1880 which allowed local authorities to remove children<br />
16