25.10.2014 Views

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANTIFEMINISM AND SEX REFORM<br />

an important part, can be seen as a token compensation for all<br />

she was to lose, rather than a step forward into sexual freedom.<br />

What she would lose was the right to be a spinster, to engage in<br />

passionate relationships with women unless they took the form<br />

dictated by his lesbian stereotypes, to compete with men for<br />

jobs <strong>and</strong> opportunities <strong>and</strong> to challenge male sexual behaviour.<br />

<strong>The</strong> movement for the glorification <strong>and</strong> protection of<br />

motherhood which spread across Europe from Germany was<br />

promoted by male sex reformers <strong>and</strong> incorporated the ideas of<br />

sex reform whilst representing itself as being part of the<br />

movement for the emancipation of women. What was the<br />

connection between the motherhood movement <strong>and</strong> sex reform?<br />

A look at the literature from Germany disabuses the reader of<br />

any notion that sex reform or even the promotion of sexual<br />

pleasure for women was necessarily in the interests of women.<br />

Two German works translated into English in 1908 <strong>and</strong> 1909<br />

are recognised as l<strong>and</strong>marks in the history of the sex reform<br />

movement. Iwan Bloch’s <strong>The</strong> Sexual Life of Our Time was<br />

translated by Eden Paul, member of the Independent Labour<br />

Party, a prominent voice in the birth control movement in<br />

Britain, <strong>and</strong> later a leading member of the British Society for<br />

the Study of Sex Psychology <strong>and</strong> contributor to the London<br />

congress of the World League for Sex Reform in 1929. Like<br />

other sex reformers Bloch assumed that there were basic<br />

biological <strong>and</strong> psychological differences between men <strong>and</strong><br />

women. He used the symbolism of the activities of sperm <strong>and</strong><br />

ova to illustrate these differences <strong>and</strong> wrote, ‘Spermatozoa <strong>and</strong><br />

ova are the original representatives of the respective spiritual<br />

natures of man <strong>and</strong> woman.’ 31 He acknowledged his debt to<br />

Ellis’s Man <strong>and</strong> Woman in the development of his ideas. Bloch<br />

described the sexual difference thus: <strong>The</strong> nature of man is<br />

aggressive, progressive, variable; that of woman is receptive,<br />

more susceptible to stimuli, simpler.’ 32<br />

From Bloch’s work we get an insight into the meaning of the<br />

link between sex reform <strong>and</strong> motherhood. He quotes the author<br />

of ‘Splitter’ who he says, has ‘well characterised woman’s<br />

extended sexual sphere’:<br />

Women are in fact pure sex from knees to neck. We men<br />

have concentrated our apparatus in a single place, we have<br />

extracted it, separated it from the rest of the body, because<br />

prêt a partir [ready to go]. <strong>The</strong>y [women] are a sexual surface<br />

or target; we have only a sexual arrow. Procreation is their<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!