The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE DECLINE OF MILITANT FEMINISM<br />
sexual intercourse after having two abortions due to failure of<br />
the husb<strong>and</strong>’s contraceptives. She is described as ‘obtaining<br />
sexual gratification at times through mere external contact or<br />
auto-erotic practice’, i.e. practices other than penetration of the<br />
vagina by the penis. 31 <strong>The</strong> husb<strong>and</strong> told his wife that he had<br />
begun to ejaculate frequently, even at the sight of an attractive<br />
woman passing by. <strong>The</strong> birth control campaigners did not see<br />
it as their task to ask why the men were suffering such acute<br />
physiological difficulties simply as a result of being deprived of<br />
one variety of sexual practice. <strong>The</strong> necessity of sexual intercourse<br />
was assumed, <strong>and</strong> the women were expected to adjust their<br />
bodies <strong>and</strong> minds to this necessity. Ottesen-Jensen gave an<br />
example of a woman who was forced, by her husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />
emotional blackmail, to engage in sexual intercourse even<br />
though her vagina was, as she described it, ‘like an open<br />
wound’. 32 <strong>The</strong> woman was given birth control <strong>and</strong> hygiene<br />
advice, so that she might divert her husb<strong>and</strong>’s psychological<br />
violence by engaging in sexual intercourse. Ottesen-Jensen offers<br />
no criticism of the husb<strong>and</strong>’s behaviour.<br />
Historians have consistently made the error of seeing birth<br />
control as a causal factor in the development of women’s sexual<br />
freedom, despite the fact that birth control is associated with<br />
only one form of heterosexual practice, <strong>and</strong> that a ‘sexual<br />
freedom’ which was only a freedom to do more sexual<br />
intercourse, with no alternative, was no real freedom at all.<br />
Feminist historians in particular have seen this supposed ‘sexual<br />
freedom’ as resulting from the way in which birth control<br />
allowed a separation between ‘sex’ <strong>and</strong> ‘reproduction’. Sheila<br />
Rowbotham pursues this line of analysis in Hidden From<br />
History (1973):<br />
the separation of sexual pleasure from procreation, contained<br />
a vital political freedom for women in making differentiation<br />
between the ‘erotic <strong>and</strong> the reproductive functions’<br />
practicable. Only when women were freed from ‘that terror<br />
of undesired pregnancy’ could they begin to enjoy sex freely. 33<br />
<strong>Her</strong>e Rowbotham is commenting on Stella Browne’s work as a<br />
birth control campaigner. She makes the mistake of equating<br />
sex with sexual intercourse; sexual activity between women<br />
after all had never contained the threat of conception, <strong>and</strong> nor<br />
indeed did many sexual practices between women <strong>and</strong> men.<br />
Birth control campaigners who promoted birth control as crucial<br />
to the liberation of women’s sexuality did not separate sex from<br />
161