25.10.2014 Views

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE DECLINE OF MILITANT FEMINISM<br />

sexual intercourse after having two abortions due to failure of<br />

the husb<strong>and</strong>’s contraceptives. She is described as ‘obtaining<br />

sexual gratification at times through mere external contact or<br />

auto-erotic practice’, i.e. practices other than penetration of the<br />

vagina by the penis. 31 <strong>The</strong> husb<strong>and</strong> told his wife that he had<br />

begun to ejaculate frequently, even at the sight of an attractive<br />

woman passing by. <strong>The</strong> birth control campaigners did not see<br />

it as their task to ask why the men were suffering such acute<br />

physiological difficulties simply as a result of being deprived of<br />

one variety of sexual practice. <strong>The</strong> necessity of sexual intercourse<br />

was assumed, <strong>and</strong> the women were expected to adjust their<br />

bodies <strong>and</strong> minds to this necessity. Ottesen-Jensen gave an<br />

example of a woman who was forced, by her husb<strong>and</strong>’s<br />

emotional blackmail, to engage in sexual intercourse even<br />

though her vagina was, as she described it, ‘like an open<br />

wound’. 32 <strong>The</strong> woman was given birth control <strong>and</strong> hygiene<br />

advice, so that she might divert her husb<strong>and</strong>’s psychological<br />

violence by engaging in sexual intercourse. Ottesen-Jensen offers<br />

no criticism of the husb<strong>and</strong>’s behaviour.<br />

Historians have consistently made the error of seeing birth<br />

control as a causal factor in the development of women’s sexual<br />

freedom, despite the fact that birth control is associated with<br />

only one form of heterosexual practice, <strong>and</strong> that a ‘sexual<br />

freedom’ which was only a freedom to do more sexual<br />

intercourse, with no alternative, was no real freedom at all.<br />

Feminist historians in particular have seen this supposed ‘sexual<br />

freedom’ as resulting from the way in which birth control<br />

allowed a separation between ‘sex’ <strong>and</strong> ‘reproduction’. Sheila<br />

Rowbotham pursues this line of analysis in Hidden From<br />

History (1973):<br />

the separation of sexual pleasure from procreation, contained<br />

a vital political freedom for women in making differentiation<br />

between the ‘erotic <strong>and</strong> the reproductive functions’<br />

practicable. Only when women were freed from ‘that terror<br />

of undesired pregnancy’ could they begin to enjoy sex freely. 33<br />

<strong>Her</strong>e Rowbotham is commenting on Stella Browne’s work as a<br />

birth control campaigner. She makes the mistake of equating<br />

sex with sexual intercourse; sexual activity between women<br />

after all had never contained the threat of conception, <strong>and</strong> nor<br />

indeed did many sexual practices between women <strong>and</strong> men.<br />

Birth control campaigners who promoted birth control as crucial<br />

to the liberation of women’s sexuality did not separate sex from<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!