25.10.2014 Views

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

The Spinster and Her Enemies - Feminish

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DECLINE OF MILITANT FEMINISM<br />

Elizabeth Abbott in the Woman’s Leader 1927 declared that<br />

the ‘new feminism’ was not feminism at all:<br />

<strong>The</strong> issue is not between ‘old’ <strong>and</strong> ‘new’ feminism. (<strong>The</strong>re is<br />

no such thing as ‘new’ feminism, just as there is no such<br />

thing as ‘new’ freedom. <strong>The</strong>re is freedom; <strong>and</strong> there is<br />

tyranny.) <strong>The</strong> issue is between feminism—equalitarianism—<br />

<strong>and</strong> that which is not feminism. 14<br />

Abbott explained that the status of motherhood could not be<br />

raised until the status of women generally was changed.<br />

Motherhood would be valued when women were valued <strong>and</strong> to<br />

be valued women must have the same rights <strong>and</strong> opportunities<br />

as men. Trying to raise the status of motherhood whilst<br />

abondoning the fight for equality, she asserted, was doomed to<br />

failure.<br />

In embracing the cause of motherhood the new feminists<br />

offered no challenge to the traditional sex-role system. No<br />

suggestion was made that men might share childcare or domestic<br />

work. <strong>The</strong>re was no suggestion that the state should provide so<br />

that men might stay at home <strong>and</strong> look after children whilst<br />

women went out to work. But it was in the reiteration of the<br />

idea that women had ‘laws of their own nature’, the basis of<br />

separate spheres ideology, that the new feminists were most at<br />

variance with those pre-war feminists who had fought so hard<br />

for the right of women to work outside the home <strong>and</strong> earn a<br />

living wage, so that they would have a choice not to be wholly<br />

dependent upon men. In ab<strong>and</strong>oning the fight for equality <strong>and</strong><br />

embracing the endowment of motherhood, Rathbone betrayed<br />

the interests of spinsters, lesbians, <strong>and</strong> any women who wished<br />

to escape from unsatisfactory relationships with men.<br />

In 1927 the equal rights supporters on the council of NUSEC<br />

resigned. In 1928 after the final stage of franchise extension to<br />

women, the 200 local suffrage societies in NUSEC split into<br />

two wings. One was the National Council for Equal Citizenship<br />

which was to press for further equal rights legislation <strong>and</strong> the<br />

other was the Union of Townswomen’s Guilds which was<br />

modelled on the Women’s Institutes <strong>and</strong> intended to play an<br />

educational role. <strong>The</strong> Townswomen’s Guilds grew <strong>and</strong> thrived<br />

whilst the political wing of the organisation declined so that by<br />

1932 there were 51 delegates to the NUSEC conference from<br />

the political societies <strong>and</strong> 183 from the guilds. <strong>The</strong> decline of<br />

the politcal societies accelerated from this time. 15 <strong>The</strong><br />

Townswomen’s Guilds were mainly concerned with home-<br />

154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!