10.11.2014 Views

OM t of c.iii - Vision Research Coordinating Center - Washington ...

OM t of c.iii - Vision Research Coordinating Center - Washington ...

OM t of c.iii - Vision Research Coordinating Center - Washington ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2/1/99 Chapter 2 Study Design page 2-11<br />

since large degrees <strong>of</strong> impairment are likely to be rare. (3) The instrument needs to<br />

measure several dimensions <strong>of</strong> well-being. We considered using the CES-Depression<br />

scale in addition to the SF-36; however, results using the CES-Depression scale that<br />

were administered at the same time as the SF-36 in the CLEK pilot study showed<br />

absolutely no trend for increased risk <strong>of</strong> depression in the total score for the CES-D or in<br />

the mental health and emotional role functioning scale <strong>of</strong> the SF-36. Thus, the<br />

measurement <strong>of</strong> emotional functioning does not justify a separate instrument like the<br />

CES-D. (4) We desire a scale that could be self-administered without compromising<br />

reliability. (5) We desire an instrument with strong psychometric properties including<br />

good factor structure, high internal consistency reliability, high test-retest reliability,<br />

and good external validity. For these reasons, the Medical Outcomes Short Form with<br />

36 items (SF-36) was selected.<br />

In addition to the SF-36 scale, a vision specific scale will be administered. The<br />

Javitt Visual Function Questionnaire (Javitt et al., 1993) was selected because the format<br />

<strong>of</strong> questions resembles the SF-36, which reduces response errors, and because it has<br />

high test-retest reliability. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire is<br />

administered beginning in the first year <strong>of</strong> follow-up in the CLEK Study (Mangione et<br />

al., 1998).<br />

2.5.6 First Definite Apical Clearance Lens<br />

At each CLEK Study Visit, the Clinician applies a series <strong>of</strong> CLEK Study trial<br />

lenses, beginning with the lens with base curve equal to the steep keratometric reading,<br />

until the first definite apical clearance fluorescein pattern is observed. This fluorescein<br />

pattern is photographed, as is the lens that is 0.2 mm flatter than the first definite apical<br />

clearance lens. This measurement provides an estimate <strong>of</strong> how flat or steep the patient’s<br />

current lenses are and better defines the current standard <strong>of</strong> contact lens care in the<br />

CLEK Study sample.<br />

Thus, the CLEK Photography Reading <strong>Center</strong> provides an independent, masked,<br />

standardized assessment <strong>of</strong> the habitual contact lens fit, the First Definite Apical<br />

Clearance Lens, and the 0.2 mm flatter lens throughout the course <strong>of</strong> the study. In doing<br />

so, the CLEK Photography Reading <strong>Center</strong> provides photodocumentation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> contact lens care <strong>of</strong> keratoconus patients in the CLEK Study sample and an<br />

estimate <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> flatness (or steepness) <strong>of</strong> the habitual contact lens as compared<br />

to the first definite apical clearance lens. Additionally, the First Definite Apical<br />

Clearance Lens provides an estimate <strong>of</strong> the progression <strong>of</strong> the steepness <strong>of</strong> the apex <strong>of</strong><br />

the cornea during the Study.<br />

2.5.7 Surgical Intervention<br />

Corneal surgery is indicated in 10-20% <strong>of</strong> all cases <strong>of</strong> keratoconus (Kennedy et<br />

al., 1986; Smiddy et al., 1988). The need for surgery has high clinical relevance, definable

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!