20.11.2014 Views

World Bank Document

World Bank Document

World Bank Document

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tion of aid directly supports private sector activity:<br />

Arab countries and 10 percent to non-Arab African counfor<br />

example, aid to agriculture generally benefits<br />

f exarmer, aid tacultue genery beneits<br />

tries. More than half of all OPEC bilateral aid goes for private farmers, and much of the money put into<br />

general budgetary support, and less than one-fifth for development finance institutions is channeled into<br />

project assistance. private industrial investment. Official donors, par-<br />

Within their bilateral programs, four of the OPEC ticularly the MDBs, have also directly encouraged<br />

donors (Abu Dhabi, Iraq, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia) private sector flows through their cofinancing with<br />

have established National Funds that administer a signif- the private sector.<br />

icant part of their project assistance. These National<br />

Funds have an authorized capital of $16 billion. They<br />

disbursed slightly less than $600 million in 1983, down of the private sector is substantiated by the analyfrom<br />

nearly $900 million in 1980. sis and conclusions of the 1982 study by the U.S.<br />

Of the 15 to 20 percent of total OPEC aid that is chan- Treasury Department of the multilateral developneled<br />

through multilateral organizations, 40 percent ment banks (MDBs). The study identified only 8<br />

goes to multilateral institutions with a broad member- percent of MDB loans supporting public sector<br />

ship; IDA and IFAD are the main recipients. The remain- activities that would clearly have been supplied by<br />

ing 60 percent goes to multilateral agencies established the private sector in an economy like that of the<br />

by OPEC members. The largest is the OPEC Fund,<br />

which received 30 percent of OPEC multilateral contribu- United States. The study noted that even this 8<br />

tions. Other significant agencies are the Arab Fund for percent may be an overestimate, since such activi-<br />

Economic and Social Development, the Islamic Develop- ties might not have been undertaken at all without<br />

ment <strong>Bank</strong>, and the Arab <strong>Bank</strong> for Economic Develop- MDB financing, given the small size of the private<br />

ment in Africa (BADEA). These four institutions have an sector in most developing countries. The study<br />

authorized capital of close to $10 billion. They disbursed also concluded that overall the MDBs' policy<br />

an average $360 million a year in net ODA between 1981 approach and advice have taken a fairly convenand<br />

1983.<br />

The assistance offered by OPEC to the developing tional market orientation.<br />

countries in the future will continue to be influenced by Over the years many studies have tried to idenits<br />

liquidity position. Given present prospects for oil tify more precisely, and if possible to quantify, the<br />

prices, the volume of OPEC aid commitments may not impact of aid on development. The biggest and<br />

register significant growth in the next few years. How- most systematic attempts have been those that<br />

ever, the level of aid disbursements by OPEC members is evaluate individual projects. In the case of the<br />

likely to decline less rapidly than their commitments for <strong>World</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> for the past ten years each of its comsome<br />

time, reflecting the lag in the former. Moreover, the Wled <strong>Bank</strong>, f redpas t as eacof it c<br />

lending levels of the development institutions created by pleted loans and credits has been covered by a<br />

OPEC members, because they have their own capital Project Performance Audit Report or Project Comendowments,<br />

may not experience as sharp a decline in pletion Report. The results are largely favorable.<br />

lending as OPEC government-to-government programs. For 504 projects where it was feasible to reestimate<br />

economic rates of return, returns of 10 percent or<br />

better were expected from 79 percent of the<br />

projects. The average return, weighted by project<br />

eral economic welfare. cost, was almost 18 percent. By sector, returns<br />

It is also true that governments have a central averaged more than 20 percent in agriculture, 18<br />

role to play in developing countries in building the percent in transport, and a little less than 13 perbasic<br />

infrastructure, administration, and human cent in industry. For 459 projects for which rates of<br />

skills needed for long-term growth and in creating return were not estimated at the time of project<br />

an environment in which the private sector can appraisal, 93 percent were judged substantially to<br />

expand-a fact generally ignored by the ardent have achieved their main objectives. Overall, only<br />

antigovernment critics. As noted earlier, a signifi- 14 percent of the projects, accounting for 9 percent<br />

cant quantity of official assistance has been of total investment, were judged at the time of<br />

directed to developing basic infrastructure, which audit to be unsatisfactory or uncertain in outcome.<br />

is an essential precondition for a modern private Although rates of return have not differed much<br />

sector. Assistance has also been used to finance between the loans to the low-income countries<br />

imports that have permitted the liberalization of made by IDA and those from the IBRD to the less<br />

the country's trade regime and to promote other poor countries, the number of projects with inadecritical<br />

economic policy reforms aimed at improved quate rates of return has recently been growing.<br />

efficiency and increased reliance on market forces These have been mainly in agriculture and in<br />

and private initiative. Furthermore, a large propor- Africa.<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!