20.11.2014 Views

World Bank Document

World Bank Document

World Bank Document

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

announced steps that, when implemented, would with more debt but no corresponding increase in<br />

permit significant reduction in its fiscal deficits in their ability to service it.<br />

the next few years. Avoiding a recessionary impact In the 1970s it was right for countries to borrow<br />

of such a policy change will require careful coordi- when real interest rates were low or negative-but<br />

nation with monetary policy in the United States only if they followed appropriate policies and<br />

and with monetary and fiscal policies in the other invested in economically justified projects. Caularge<br />

industrial countries.<br />

tion in defining borrowing limits was required. It<br />

The second issue of vital concern to developing was wrong to assume that low interest rates would<br />

countries is protectionism. To service their foreign continue, and it is always expensive to reverse<br />

debts, the biggest debtors will need to run large investment decisions. These mistakes are quickly<br />

trade surpluses in the next few years. Yet many exposed when world conditions deteriorate, as<br />

import restrictions-on steel, sugar, and beef, for they did in the early 1980s.<br />

example-have affected primarily major debtors Developing countries suffered in 1979-84 from a<br />

including Argentina, Brazil, Korea, and Mexico. combination of more expensive oil, historically<br />

Other restrictions, such as the Multifibre Arrange- high real interest rates, prolonged recession in<br />

ment, affect a broader range of countries. The industrial economies, and more trade barriers.<br />

harder the big debtors find it to service their debt, Despite this, as many as 100 countries have continthe<br />

greater the strains on the world's banking sys- ued to service their foreign debt without interruptem.<br />

tion. Some have experienced only small shocks<br />

When developing countries cannot earn the for- (for example, some countries that are oil exporters)<br />

eign exchange to expand their imports, exporters or have benefited from workers' remittances (for<br />

in the industrial countries are also damaged. To example, certain Asian and Middle Eastern countake<br />

one example, this was an important factor in tries). Some had borrowed only a little or mainly<br />

explaining why U.S. exports of manufactures to on concessional terms in the 1970s (for example,<br />

major debtors fell by 40 percent between 1980-81 China, Colombia, and India). And some who borand<br />

1983-84. Such harm is widespread, since rowed undertook economic policy reforms that<br />

industrial economies run a surplus on trade in facilitated debt servicing (for example, Indonesia<br />

manufactured goods with developing countries. and Korea).<br />

And protectionism acts as a brake on the adjust- Countries that ran into debt-servicing difficulment<br />

and growth that the industrial countries ties, however, were not necessarily those that had<br />

themselves so badly need.<br />

suffered the biggest shocks. They were countries<br />

Over the longer term, protectionist barriers in that had borrowed and failed to adjust or had not<br />

the industrial world can have a profound effect on tackled the new problems with sufficient urgency.<br />

development strategy. They suggest to govern- Among these were the low-income countries of<br />

ments in developing countries that a strategy Africa, in which development is a long-term<br />

based on export growth is highly risky, and thus process constrained by weak institutional strucencourage<br />

a return to the inward-looking policies tures, a shortage of skills, and often (as in the past<br />

of earlier years. Evidence is abundant that such ten years) natural disasters as well. These counpolicies<br />

are bad for growth and employment in the tries have traditionally used concessional capital<br />

developing countries and also reduce the scope for from abroad to finance the bulk of their investindustrial<br />

countries to promote improvements in ment. In the 1970s they were faced with higher<br />

productivity in their own economies.<br />

import bills. Many African countries that had commodity<br />

booms were able to borrow on commercial<br />

Policies of developing countries<br />

terms when interest rates were low. They used this<br />

foreign finance partly for consumption and also for<br />

The past dozen years have underlined, as dis- investment in large public projects, many of which<br />

cussed in Chapter 4, the crucial role of domestic contributed little to economic growth and to<br />

policies in determining the performance of devel- increased exports needed to service the debt. Capioping<br />

countries-particularly in the use they make tal inflows enabled some countries to postpone<br />

of foreign finance. Foreign finance can promote policy reforms. Debt-servicing difficulties could<br />

growth through higher investment and technology have been expected and did occur. The net result<br />

transfers. It can allow countries to adjust gradually has been a further setback to their economic develto<br />

new circumstances in the world economy. But opment.<br />

it can also be misused, so that countries end up The second group of countries with debt difficul-<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!