20.11.2014 Views

World Bank Document

World Bank Document

World Bank Document

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Box 5.3<br />

Estimating the grant element<br />

The grant element in a loan is defined as the difference In theory, the discount rate should be carefully chosen<br />

between the original face value of the loan and the dis- to reflect the cost of capital. In practice, a 10 percent rate<br />

counted present value of debt service, as a percentage of is usually assumed for all currencies and time periodsthe<br />

original face value. As Box table 5.3A shows, the the convention used in the grant element tables pubgrant<br />

element is greater the lower the interest rate on the lished by the OECD. However, using any single inflexiloan<br />

and the longer its maturity or grace period. ble rate has obvious drawbacks, as it does not take<br />

account of changes in market interest rates or of big differences<br />

in rates for different currencies.<br />

Box table 5.3A Grant element of selected loan terms A better alternative is to set the discount rate equal to<br />

the rate of interest at which commercial finance with the<br />

Loain termns<br />

same maturity could be borrowed in international mar-<br />

Interest rate Maturity Grace period Grant element, kets at the time and in the particular currency of the loan<br />

10 percent discount rate in question. In many instances, of course, commercial<br />

0 30 5 77 percent funds would not be available for such long maturities, so<br />

6 20 0 23 percent a premium should be added to the discount rate to make<br />

6 10 0 15 percent allowance for this. The effect of a discount rate that var-<br />

6 10 5 21 percent ies according to currency and over time is to lower the<br />

15 percent discount rate grant element for official loans from countries in which<br />

6 10 5 40 percent interest rates are low and to raise it for loans from couna.<br />

Assumes immediate disbursement of loan and equal annual repay- tries in which rates are high and during periods of high<br />

ments.<br />

international rates in general.<br />

Box 5.4<br />

Three innovative financial instruments and their use by developing countries<br />

Three financial instruments that are increasingly used in * Graduated payment loans. Debt service payments are<br />

domestic financial markets (notably the mortgage mar- initially low and gradually build up. In the early years of<br />

ket) have not yet been used by developing countries, but a loan, amortization may even be negative. This instrumay<br />

have certain merits for them. ment could be particularly suitable for project finance,<br />

* Flexible maturity loans. Instead of variable interest where earnings and debt-servicing capacity rise as the<br />

rates, loans carry a variable maturity. Debt service pay- project matures. By matching the stream of debt service<br />

ments are held constant in absolute terms (or, perhaps, obligations with the expected foreign exchange earnings<br />

in relation to a borrower's income). When interest rates of a project, debt managers would avoid tying up foreign<br />

rise, the amortization part of debt service declines and reserves for debt servicing.<br />

the loan's maturity increases accordingly. With a large * Shared equity loans. Lenders would accept belowrise<br />

in interest rates, negative amortization will occur; market interest rates in return for a share in the equity of<br />

lenders will effectively be providing new money to bor- projects. For the borrower, the risk involved in a project<br />

rowers. Flexible maturity loans offer advantages to both is shared with the lender. However, since a project's<br />

borrowers and lenders. Borrowers are certain of their earnings depend on what price is charged for its output,<br />

debt-servicing obligations. Lenders are able to manage a loan agreement would have to contain some pricing<br />

their assets with less worry about debt rescheduling and formula. This would give lenders some influence over<br />

possible write-offs. For developing countries, this would the management of the project (though it would also<br />

be doubly attractive if debt service payments could be raise their administrative costs). Lenders might also<br />

tied to export receipts, as it would reduce the uncertainty want to stipulate some compensation procedure or<br />

over volatile commodity prices.<br />

insurance against political risks.<br />

nerability of borrowing countries to rising interest Debt managers may sometimes be able to raise the<br />

rates. For those developing countries that have proportion of debt at fixed terms. For example, offirecently<br />

rescheduled their debts, the proportion of cial export credits can often substitute for commercial<br />

debt at floating rates (34 percent at the end of 1983) borrowing (see Chapter 7). New financial instruwas<br />

nearly twice that of nonrescheduling coun- ments, such as flexible maturity and shared equity<br />

tries. Similarly, the interest to exports ratio of loans, are becoming available to developing counreschedulers<br />

was more than twice that of nonre- tries (see Box 5.4). And some middle-income counschedulers<br />

and rose much faster between 1980 and tries are already using interest rate swaps to ex-<br />

1982. change floating rate for fixed rate loans (see Box 5.5).<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!