24.12.2014 Views

Set of supplementary notes.

Set of supplementary notes.

Set of supplementary notes.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.2. MAGNETISM 141<br />

Multiplying the Curie law for local moments with this fraction k B T/E F transforms it, up to a<br />

constant <strong>of</strong> order one, into the Pauli expression for metals.<br />

Now let us include in a very simple fashion the effect <strong>of</strong> interactions. The Stoner-Hubbard<br />

model, which provides arguably the simplest way forward, includes an energy penalty U for<br />

lattice sites which are doubly occupied, i.e. they hold both an up- and a down-spin electron.<br />

Ĥ int = ∑ sitesi<br />

Un i↑ n i↓ , (9.27)<br />

If we treat this interaction in a mean-field approximation, it leads to a shift <strong>of</strong> the energies<br />

<strong>of</strong> the two spin bands<br />

ɛ k↑ = ɛ k + U ¯n ↓ − µ 0 µ B H<br />

ɛ k↓ = ɛ k + U ¯n ↑ + µ 0 µ B H (9.28)<br />

We see that the presence <strong>of</strong> spin-down electrons increases the energy <strong>of</strong> the spin-up electrons<br />

in the same way as a magnetic field pointing down would. Conversely, spin-up electrons cause<br />

the energy <strong>of</strong> spin-down electrons to increase in the same way as a magnetic field pointing<br />

up. The interactions between the electrons appear formally in the same way as an additional<br />

magnetic field. This so-called exchange field is not physical in the sense that it could deflect<br />

a compass needle, it is a book-keeping device to handle the effects <strong>of</strong> the Coulomb interaction<br />

between the electrons.<br />

With the same approximation as before - that the density <strong>of</strong> states can be taken to be a<br />

constant, we can then self-consistently determine the average spin density<br />

N<br />

V (¯n ↑ − ¯n ↓ ) = [U(¯n ↑ − ¯n ↓ ) + 2µ 0 µ B H] 1 2 g v(E F ) . (9.29)<br />

The magnetisation is M = µ B (n ↑ − n ↓ ) which then gives us the static spin susceptibility<br />

χ σ = µ 0<br />

µ 2 B g(E F )<br />

1 − Ug(E F )<br />

2<br />

. (9.30)<br />

Here, g de<strong>notes</strong> the density <strong>of</strong> states per atom, in contrast to g v = N g, which is the density<br />

V<br />

<strong>of</strong> states per unit volume. In comparison to the non-interacting case, the magnetic susceptibility<br />

is enhanced, and will diverge if U is large enough that the Stoner criterion is satisfied<br />

Ug(E F )<br />

2<br />

which marks the onset <strong>of</strong> ferromagnetism in this model.<br />

> 1 , (9.31)<br />

The Stoner criterion for ferromagnetic order has a very fundamental interpretation: because<br />

the density <strong>of</strong> states per atom is <strong>of</strong> order 1<br />

F<br />

, the Stoner criterion expresses the balance between<br />

interaction energy U and kinetic energy E F . If the kinetic energy <strong>of</strong> the electrons is high, then<br />

they will not form a magnetically ordered state. If, on the other hand, the interaction strength<br />

is higher than the kinetic energy, then the electron system can lower its energy by aligning its<br />

spins. Variations on this criterion surface in many other areas <strong>of</strong> correlated electron physics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!