24.12.2014 Views

Set of supplementary notes.

Set of supplementary notes.

Set of supplementary notes.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.5. PSEUDOPOTENTIALS 71<br />

4.5 Pseudopotentials<br />

The NFE method and the tight-binding method are not accurate methods <strong>of</strong> electronic structure determination;<br />

nevertheless both <strong>of</strong> them exhibit the basic principles. They are commonly used to write down<br />

simple models for bands, with their parameters fit to more sophisticated calculations, or to experiment.<br />

It turns out that band gaps in semiconductors are usually fairly small, and the true dispersion can be<br />

modelled by scattering from a few Fourier components <strong>of</strong> the lattice potential. The reason is that the<br />

relevant scattering potential for valence band electrons is however MUCH smaller than the full atomic<br />

potential ze 2 /r <strong>of</strong> an electron interacting with a nucleus <strong>of</strong> charge z. The effective potential for scattering<br />

<strong>of</strong> the valence electrons by the atomic cores is a weak pseudopotential.<br />

When we consider the band structure <strong>of</strong> a typical solid, we are concerned only with the valence<br />

electrons, and not with those tightly bound in the core, which remain nearly atomic. If we solve the<br />

full Schrödinger equation with the real Coulomb potential, we expect to calculate not just the valence<br />

electronic states, but also the atomic like core states. A pseudopotential reproduces the valence states as<br />

the lowest eigenstates <strong>of</strong> the problem and neglects the core states.<br />

Figure 4.7: Pseudopotential: The true potential V (r) has a wavefunction for the valence electrons<br />

that oscillates rapidly near the core. The pseudopotential V s (r) has a wavefunction Φ s (r)<br />

that is smooth near the core, but approximates the true wavefunction far from the core region.<br />

A weak pseudopotential acting on a smooth pseudo-wavefunction gives nearly the same energy eigenvalues<br />

for the valence electrons as the full atomic potential does acting on real wavefunctions. Away<br />

from the atomic cores, the pseudopotential matches the true potential, and the pseudo-wavefunction<br />

approximates the true one.<br />

A formal derivation <strong>of</strong> how this works can be given using the method <strong>of</strong> orthogonalised plane waves.<br />

The atomic states are well described by the Bloch functions f nk <strong>of</strong> the LCAO or tight-binding scheme<br />

(4.32). Higher states, which extend well beyond the atoms will not necessarily be <strong>of</strong> this kind, but they<br />

must be orthogonal to the core levels. This suggests that we should use as a basis 3<br />

|χ k >= |k > − ∑ n<br />

β n |f nk > , (4.33)<br />

where |k > is a plane wave, and the coefficients β n (k) are chosen to make the states χ orthogonal to the<br />

core states |f nk >. The states in (4.33) are orthogonalised plane waves (OPW); away from the core, they<br />

3 We use Dirac’s notation <strong>of</strong> bra and ket, where |k > represents the plane wave state exp(ik · r), and <<br />

φ 1 |T |φ 2 > represents the matrix element ∫ dr φ ∗ 1(r)T (r)φ 2 (r) <strong>of</strong> the operator T .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!