24.12.2014 Views

Set of supplementary notes.

Set of supplementary notes.

Set of supplementary notes.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2. BLOCH’S THEOREM FROM DISCRETE TRANSLATIONAL SYMMETRY 57<br />

By taking out a factor e iqr , this can be rewritten as<br />

ψ q (r) = e iqr ∑ G<br />

c q−G e −iGr = e iqr u j,q (r)<br />

where the function u j,q (r) is built from periodic function e −iGr , and must therefore have<br />

the same periodicity as the lattice.<br />

This is Bloch’s theorem:<br />

Eigenstates <strong>of</strong> the one-electron Hamiltonian can be chosen to be a plane wave<br />

multiplied by a function with the periodicity <strong>of</strong> the Bravais lattice.<br />

4.2 Bloch’s theorem from discrete translational symmetry<br />

Another way <strong>of</strong> thinking about Bloch’s theorem is to consider what happens to an eigenstate<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Hamiltonian (kinetic energy plus periodic lattice potential), if it is translated in space.<br />

An arbitrary translation operation will not necessarily produce an eigenstate, because the new<br />

state, generated by this translation, may not match the lattice potential correctly. If the<br />

translation operation is matched to the lattice, however, so if it is a translation by a Bravais<br />

lattice vector, then the resulting state is also an eigenstate <strong>of</strong> the Hamiltonian. The reason<br />

for this lies in the connection between symmetry and quantum mechanics, which is discussed<br />

in quantum mechanics courses: if an operator (such as the Hamiltonian) is unchanged under<br />

a change <strong>of</strong> coordinate system (i.e. a symmetry operation such as translation, rotation, etc.),<br />

then applying a symmetry operation on the eigenstate <strong>of</strong> such an operator produces another<br />

eigenstate <strong>of</strong> the operator, with the same eigenvalue as the original one.<br />

Either the two eigenstates produced by the symmetry operation are actually the same and<br />

differ only by a complex prefactor, or they are different, in which case we are dealing with a<br />

set <strong>of</strong> degenerate eigenstates.<br />

In the first case, it is clear that the original eigenstate is also an eigenstate <strong>of</strong> the symmetry<br />

operation. In the second case, it can be shown that we can always choose from the subspace <strong>of</strong><br />

degenerate eigenstates a set <strong>of</strong> eigenstates which are also eigenstates <strong>of</strong> the symmetry operation.<br />

Lattices are symmetric under discrete translation <strong>of</strong> the coordinate system by lattice vectors.<br />

Accordingly, the eigenstates <strong>of</strong> the Hamiltonian can be chosen to be eigenstates <strong>of</strong> the discrete<br />

lattice translation operation. This is the underlying origin <strong>of</strong> Bloch’s theorem, which we will<br />

now explore in more detail.<br />

4.2.1 Symmetry in quantum mechanics – applied to the lattice<br />

Consider a symmetry operator ˆT, e.g. translation<br />

〈 〉<br />

r|ˆTψ = ψ(r + a).<br />

If the Hamiltonian Ĥ commutes with the symmetry operator ˆT, then this implies that ˆT<br />

maps one eigenstate <strong>of</strong> the Hamiltonian Ĥ onto another eigenstate <strong>of</strong> Ĥ with the same energy:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!