26.12.2014 Views

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

90 Deleveraging, What Deleveraging<br />

the demand for its goods internally, by generating new credit. In the end, China<br />

is no different from the US: debt and the current account offset each other.<br />

Next, we need to think carefully what we mean by a growth shock, which<br />

plays a central role in the report’s narrative. One shock could be supply-driven,<br />

associated with slower technological progress. Another possibility is that the<br />

crisis reveals a previous slowing down of global demand. We do not have a firm<br />

answer, but demand is more likely to be the culprit. When we look at the runup<br />

of debt in the US, we observe that the income distribution really matters.<br />

Surprisingly, perhaps, during the peak of the leverage cycle in the US people<br />

with declining incomes were the ones borrowing at a higher rate. Resolving that<br />

puzzle is crucial, because the long-run implications differ. In particular, we cannot<br />

really make statements about debt capacity until we have an answer. Nor can we<br />

decide whether the crisis was caused by a Minsky moment after unsustainable<br />

debt accumulation, or whether we have entered a period of secular stagnation<br />

that requires winding down debts.<br />

Morning general discussion<br />

Luigi Buttiglione sought to reassure the discussants that the potential growth<br />

measures are robust. Accepting that there is a lack of consensus that potential<br />

growth is slowing down in the US and that the current low interest rate<br />

environment can have positive effects, he indicated that the results of the<br />

report do not hinge on these considerations. Vincent Reinhart accepted that the<br />

traditional debt-to-GDP ratio is a partial measure of leverage. He agreed that it<br />

might be important to consider a time-varying discount rate. As far as Greece<br />

is concerned, for instance, changing the discount rate does indeed make a big<br />

difference.<br />

The ensuing discussion first focused on the assessment of debt capacity and,<br />

more specifically, on estimates of GDP, both potential levels and future trends.<br />

Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas suggested looking not just at nominal variables but<br />

also at the evolution of prices. Also, the report should clarify the rate of variation<br />

in the estimation of potential output. Attilio Zanetti emphasised that we do<br />

not really know what the optimal level of debt-to-GDP is. Much more research<br />

is needed at the country level, keeping in mind country-specific characteristics.<br />

Cédric Tille suggested using demographics and productivity to obtain more<br />

transparent estimates, a view strongly supported by Agnès Benassy-Quéré and<br />

Amlan Roy.<br />

Many participants noted the need for a more detailed look at debts. Cédric Tille<br />

stressed the issue of contingent liabilities. Attilio Zanetti noted that the private<br />

and public sectors do not always have the same access to credit. In the case of<br />

China, for instance, private enterprises do not receive as much credit as the stateowned<br />

companies. If market-oriented sectors are allowed access to credit, this<br />

in turn generates more leverage, but in this case it reflects a better allocation<br />

of resources. Jean-Pierre Landau reminded the conference that not only is it a<br />

sovereign problem, but it is also relevant for the corporate sector as well and that<br />

the asset side of the balance sheet is important as well as the liability side. He

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!