1qGLG9p
1qGLG9p
1qGLG9p
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 Deleveraging, What Deleveraging<br />
Still, the legacy of the past crisis remains severe in developed markets, especially<br />
in the peripheral countries of the Eurozone, which remain vulnerable due to the<br />
complexity of their crisis and the partial inadequacies of the mix and sequence<br />
of the policies adopted. Anglo-Saxon economies – namely, the US and the UK –<br />
seem to have managed the trade-off between deleveraging policies and output<br />
costs better so far, by avoiding a credit crunch while achieving a meaningful<br />
reduction of debt exposure of the private sector and the financial system. This<br />
result, however, was achieved at the cost of a substantial re-leveraging of the<br />
public sector, including the central banks, whose deleveraging is a primary policy<br />
challenge for the years to come.<br />
1.2 Leverage: What we mean by it and why it matters<br />
The concept of leverage has many applications in economics. 2 At the sectoral<br />
level, the levels of household debt and corporate debt are much studied in terms<br />
of their implications for consumption and investment behaviour. The leverage<br />
of financial-sector entities (banks and other types of financial intermediaries)<br />
also gives rise to a range of concerns in relation to the incentives facing financial<br />
firms and vulnerability to funding shocks. At the sovereign level, the stock of<br />
public debt has implications for projected levels of spending and taxation, in<br />
addition to determining exposure to financial shocks. Finally, the aggregate<br />
level of external debt matters for national macroeconomic performance, with<br />
the stock of external debt also an important factor in determining exposure to<br />
international funding crises and sudden stops in capital flows.<br />
Of course, the stock of debt has to be assessed in the context of the overall<br />
balance sheet. On the liability side, debt gives rise to more concerns if there is<br />
only a thin layer of equity liabilities to provide a buffer against losses. On the<br />
asset side, debt that is backed by liquid assets with stable returns is less likely to<br />
generate repayment problems than debt that is used to fund illiquid assets with<br />
volatile returns.<br />
At the same time, a snapshot of a balance sheet is insufficient to conduct<br />
a debt sustainability exercise. In particular, the stock of financial assets does<br />
not provide a good guide to repayment capacity, since much debt is serviced<br />
through future income streams that are not typically capitalised in the balance<br />
sheet. For example, household debt may be primarily serviced through wage<br />
earnings, while the main asset for most households is non-financial (the family<br />
home). Similarly, early-stage firms may have few assets but healthy streams of<br />
projected future earnings. For banks, the quality of loan assets is determined<br />
by the underlying income streams of their customers. As for the government, it<br />
typically has limited financial assets, holds very illiquid non-financial assets and<br />
funds debt servicing from future revenue streams.<br />
While taking note of the wide range of other relevant factors, the debt-toincome<br />
ratio remains a key metric in assessing debt sustainability. In truth, this<br />
2 See also the review of different types of debt overhang provided by Brown and Lane (2011).