26.12.2014 Views

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 Deleveraging, What Deleveraging<br />

Still, the legacy of the past crisis remains severe in developed markets, especially<br />

in the peripheral countries of the Eurozone, which remain vulnerable due to the<br />

complexity of their crisis and the partial inadequacies of the mix and sequence<br />

of the policies adopted. Anglo-Saxon economies – namely, the US and the UK –<br />

seem to have managed the trade-off between deleveraging policies and output<br />

costs better so far, by avoiding a credit crunch while achieving a meaningful<br />

reduction of debt exposure of the private sector and the financial system. This<br />

result, however, was achieved at the cost of a substantial re-leveraging of the<br />

public sector, including the central banks, whose deleveraging is a primary policy<br />

challenge for the years to come.<br />

1.2 Leverage: What we mean by it and why it matters<br />

The concept of leverage has many applications in economics. 2 At the sectoral<br />

level, the levels of household debt and corporate debt are much studied in terms<br />

of their implications for consumption and investment behaviour. The leverage<br />

of financial-sector entities (banks and other types of financial intermediaries)<br />

also gives rise to a range of concerns in relation to the incentives facing financial<br />

firms and vulnerability to funding shocks. At the sovereign level, the stock of<br />

public debt has implications for projected levels of spending and taxation, in<br />

addition to determining exposure to financial shocks. Finally, the aggregate<br />

level of external debt matters for national macroeconomic performance, with<br />

the stock of external debt also an important factor in determining exposure to<br />

international funding crises and sudden stops in capital flows.<br />

Of course, the stock of debt has to be assessed in the context of the overall<br />

balance sheet. On the liability side, debt gives rise to more concerns if there is<br />

only a thin layer of equity liabilities to provide a buffer against losses. On the<br />

asset side, debt that is backed by liquid assets with stable returns is less likely to<br />

generate repayment problems than debt that is used to fund illiquid assets with<br />

volatile returns.<br />

At the same time, a snapshot of a balance sheet is insufficient to conduct<br />

a debt sustainability exercise. In particular, the stock of financial assets does<br />

not provide a good guide to repayment capacity, since much debt is serviced<br />

through future income streams that are not typically capitalised in the balance<br />

sheet. For example, household debt may be primarily serviced through wage<br />

earnings, while the main asset for most households is non-financial (the family<br />

home). Similarly, early-stage firms may have few assets but healthy streams of<br />

projected future earnings. For banks, the quality of loan assets is determined<br />

by the underlying income streams of their customers. As for the government, it<br />

typically has limited financial assets, holds very illiquid non-financial assets and<br />

funds debt servicing from future revenue streams.<br />

While taking note of the wide range of other relevant factors, the debt-toincome<br />

ratio remains a key metric in assessing debt sustainability. In truth, this<br />

2 See also the review of different types of debt overhang provided by Brown and Lane (2011).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!