26.12.2014 Views

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

52 Deleveraging, What Deleveraging<br />

Figure 4.10 Eurozone financial corporations: Assets by type of institution<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

EMU - Financial assets / GDP<br />

Financial corporations<br />

Insurance corporations and<br />

pension funds<br />

OFI and financial auxiliaries<br />

200<br />

Other MFI<br />

100<br />

0<br />

99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13<br />

The central bank<br />

Source: Authors’ calculations based on ECB and OECD data.<br />

If we now look at the leverage of banks as measured by the capital-to-asset ratio<br />

and compare the Eurozone with the US (Figure 4.11), we can see a difference in<br />

both the timing and the size of the adjustment. Since comparing these ratios<br />

for the two economies is made difficult by differences in accounting standards,<br />

we report an index that sets both ratios at 100 in 2008. The chart shows that,<br />

while the US banking sector was recapitalised shortly after the Lehman event,<br />

the Eurozone banks have started this process only recently. The process of bank<br />

recapitalisation in the Eurozone is ongoing in the context of the Asset Quality<br />

Review and the stress tests that will be completed in October 2014. Some further<br />

deleveraging should therefore be expected in the near future.<br />

There are of course reasons for the delayed action on the recapitalisation of<br />

banks in the Eurozone: the large size of individual banks relative to governments<br />

was a significant factor that made recapitalisation via public money difficult,<br />

but governance and structural factors (e.g. cross-shareholding arrangements<br />

typical in many Eurozone countries) were also obstacles to the initiation of a<br />

decisive process (Reichlin, 2014). Had a Eurozone mechanism for the resolution<br />

of banking crises been in place at that time, we would probably have seen more<br />

timely action and a more rapid adjustment of the financial sector. The discussion<br />

of the limits of the Eurozone institutional architecture and the role that these<br />

limits played during the crisis goes beyond the scope of this report. As food for<br />

thought for that discussion, however, it is interesting to observe that lack of<br />

aggressive action towards the banks did not spare the Eurozone from persistent<br />

declines in lending, although it is difficult to distinguish between the causes of<br />

weak lending to the real economy: limited supply of credit caused by undercapitalisation<br />

of the banking sector; increasing risks of credit related to the<br />

protracted weakness of the real economy; or lack of demand, also as a result of<br />

weakness in the real economy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!