26.12.2014 Views

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

1qGLG9p

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case studies 39<br />

Figure 4.2<br />

US output, actual and past trends<br />

63,000<br />

US output per capita in PPP-adjusted intl dollars<br />

and trend extrapolated through 2001<br />

58,000<br />

53,000<br />

United States<br />

Prior trend<br />

48,000<br />

43,000<br />

38,000<br />

33,000<br />

2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013<br />

Source: IMF (2014b), authors’ calculations.<br />

This over-enthusiasm is seen more starkly in debt capacity (Figure 4.3). The<br />

solid line calculates the net present value of future output launching from the<br />

then-current estimate of potential output. The dashed line starts the net present<br />

value summation from the current level of output. Borrowers looking at their<br />

current incomes in the early 2000s might not have appreciated that the thenapparent<br />

debt capacity was unsustainable because excess demand was untenable<br />

and growth would slow. The sharp break in the dashed line makes it plain that<br />

debtors would be pressed to repay.<br />

Figure 4.3<br />

760,000<br />

740,000<br />

720,000<br />

700,000<br />

680,000<br />

US debt capacity<br />

US net present value of output per capita in<br />

PPP-adjusted international dollars<br />

660,000<br />

640,000<br />

620,000<br />

600,000<br />

Using potential<br />

output<br />

Using actual output<br />

2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013<br />

Source: IMF (2014b), authors’ calculations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!